Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Garry Blankenship's avatar

Allowing sovereign lands within a sovereign land is without logic and more importantly without equality. I am fatigued from repeating myself but those historically abused and their abusers no longer live. If those claiming indigenous heritage are entitled to rights and privileges above all other occupants of the land via sovereignty, they should be treated the same as all sovereign lands. Why is it that there is no acknowledgement in this country for Caucasian heritage ? Why is it that heritage, real or claimed, matters ? I happen to be an admirer of was is wrongly termed Native American art. I am a native born American, but have no claim to indigenous ancestry.

The local coastal tribes in particular with their inspiring double images of a real image coupled with it's spirit image. Federal grants paid for by all those without any claim to indigenous ancestry are gifted to those with that claim indigenous status and then the non-indigenous must pay more taxes to provide the infrastructure used by the indigenous who do not equally pay their share. The altruistic image of a "Native American" using spears and bark woven fishing nets for sustenance is shattered when they use motor powered boats and equipment and nylon monofilament gill nets . This incongruence must be addressed. Native or non-native ? Why is one's ancestry rewarded, while another's is not in a society built on equality ? Sovereign is sovereign. In or out. Not both and.

Expand full comment
Jennifer's avatar

What most people don't have, but can't live without is the cost of health insurance. Most have high deductibles with many areas of health care either not covered, or partially covered. Most live in fear that they are one injury or illness away from losing their assets.

Native Americans don't have health care concerns looming over the heads. WE cover that cost too.

Expand full comment
58 more comments...

No posts