Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dr. Sarah's avatar

The 'skunk video' issue still doesn't sit right with me. Seegers explicitly addresses the context of the 'Shotgun Sermon' on his website, and the debate missed a major opportunity to clarify this: my understanding is that these remarks were made during the church's announcement period, not as part of an actual sermon.

If that’s true, Seegers is absolutely right to frame this as a freedom of speech issue. It also makes French’s demand for an apology seem deeply contradictory, especially coming from someone who claims to be a free-speech absolutist.

That audience question was clearly designed as a 'gotcha' about the separation of church and state. But if we acknowledge the actual context—community announcements rather than formal pastoral instruction—both candidates should theoretically be on the exact same side of the underlying principles here: protecting free speech and maintaining the separation of church and state.

Am I missing something here?

Robert's avatar

Thank you for this roundup, Jeff! Stark differences in both philosophy and approach have been highlighted. The key for implementing change in this election will be in voter turnout. If you support Jake and the change he represents, it is incumbent upon you to remind friends and neighbors how important each and every vote is, and to encourage them to cast their ballot rather than sit on the sidelines.

130 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?