When the Law Doesn't Apply
After reviewing the DNR police report on the “Troublemakers,” the public is left wondering whether accountability will follow
Imagine five people walking onto your property, tearing down survey markers, knowingly causing nearly $10,000 in damage — and filming themselves while they do it. Regional media then celebrate their actions. You have their full names, addresses, ages, and even video of them committing the crime. You provide physical descriptions. And still… nothing happens.
That is exactly what occurred on the Doc Holliday timber parcel — land owned not by a private corporation, but by you: the Washington State Taxpayer. Managed by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), this trust land exists for a very specific purpose: to fund public schools and critical county services like roads, fire districts, libraries, hospitals, ports, and emergency management.
Yet when five self-described activists — the “Troublemakers” — hiked into the Doc Holliday sale area, removed survey and boundary markers, and hand-delivered them to DNR headquarters in Olympia, the accountability that ordinary citizens would face simply never materialized.
A Crime Against Public Services
According to the DNR police report, the initial cost to remark the timber-sale boundaries was estimated at $9,536, not including delays or staff time. That damage wasn’t symbolic — it directly interrupts the flow of revenue to the Washington State Common School Trust and State Land Transfer Fund, two major funding streams for school construction and county services.
A DNR Police Officer — and former Washington State Patrol Sergeant — filed a detailed investigation after Commissioner of Public Lands Hilary Franz vested him with police powers in March 2024. His findings paint a clear, indisputable picture.
The Crime Was Filmed, Publicly Posted, and Self-Identified
A YouTube video of the event — posted by the activists themselves — shows the “Troublemakers” removing boundary markers in Unit 5 of the Doc Holliday timber sale. The officer preserved the video, obtained a search warrant, and downloaded it as evidence. DNR staff verified that the markers shown in the video matched those missing from the sale area.
The video identifies all five participants:
Tim Wheeler, 84, Sequim
Peter Stedman, 68, Port Angeles
Emily Johnston, 58, Seattle
Lisa Dekker, 72, Port Angeles
Keith Dekker, 70, Port Angeles
Their intent was not subtle — or deniable. It was spoken directly into the camera.
Their Own Words, on Camera
The Troublemakers repeatedly admit their plan to interfere with state operations:
“There are some things more important than just obeying a law.” — Wheeler
“When you see pink, just pull it off.” — Stedman
“We are here to remove the survey flagging so DNR can’t sell it.” — Johnston
“It’s going to slow them down…” — K. Dekker
“Sorry DNR, not sorry.” — L. Dekker
They removed flags, stakes, signs, and boundary markers throughout the parcel — laughing, encouraging one another, and documenting the entire process.
Clear Evidence, Clear Intent — and No Action
Washington law is straightforward. Under RCW 9A.48.070, Malicious Mischief in the First Degree, it is a felony to knowingly cause:
More than $5,000 in damage to property
Interruption or impairment of a public service
The officer recommended charges accordingly. The evidence meets both criteria:
Physical damage exceeding $9,500
Delayed timber revenue needed for schools and county services
Recorded admissions of intent
Yet despite the report, despite the video, despite the statements from the suspects themselves, and despite the financial impact on public services… no charges were filed.
Why Not?
That’s the unanswered question.
Why, in Clallam County, do some people face aggressive enforcement for far less — while others openly break the law on state land, brag about it, and are treated like folk heroes?
Why are crimes against public property and schools treated differently when those committing them belong to certain activist groups?
And what message does it send when state officials allow this kind of destruction to go unaddressed on video?
A Two-Tiered Standard of Accountability
Washington’s 3 million acres of trust lands are supposed to be managed efficiently to support schools and local government. When those lands are vandalized, the victims aren’t corporations — they’re public institutions and taxpayers.
If a logger removed these markers, they’d be arrested.
If a homeowner did this, they’d be charged.
But when activists do it with a camera crew… nothing happens.
The public deserves to know why.
DNR Police completed the report in August of this year and forwarded it to the Clallam County Prosecuting Attorney, who can be reached at mark.nichols@clallamcountywa.gov.







It's time Mr. Nichols held a public forum and explained his prosecutorial thought process and recited his list of excuses.
Below are three examples of allegations of vandalism and how they were handled. Clearly, there seems to be no proper chain of command because, IT’S NOT WHAT YOU KNOW, IT’S WHO YOU KNOW.
One (allegations against Jeff Tozzer) was initiated and LED by the Commissioner Ozias, who alerted not only the county sheriff, but also the prosecuting attorney. It was investigated and Jeff was cleared.
The second was student vandalism which was handled by a police report and handed over to the prosecuting attorney.
The third was a report by the county sheriff, turned over to the prosecuting attorney, then ignored.
(1) CCWD Jan 24, 2024 When a husband and wife who own land near Towne Road felt they were in imminent danger from endless threats, stalking, and harassment, they did something most residents wouldn’t consider: they emailed their county commissioner (Mark Ozias) Rather than REFER THE CONCERNED COUPLE THROUGH PROPER CHANNELS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, THE COMMISSIONER INITIALLY LED THE INVESTIGATION BY ALERTING THE COUNTY SHERIFF AND PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, both of whose salary is set by the Board of Commissioners. Additionally, the county’s chief criminal deputy was enlisted to aid in an investigation that lasted nearly a month.
https://www.ccwatchdog.com/p/we-need-help-family-begs-county
(2) SEQUIM GAZETTE June 25, 2025 Nichols, the prosecuting attorney, confirmed on July 17 that his office had received the police department’s referral, and said he believes his staff will have some follow-up questions with the detectives to “make an informed charging decision.” He said the earliest his office could make a decision on any potential charges is sometime this week (July 21-25).
https://www.sequimgazette.com/news/up-to-45-seniors-could-face-charges-for-shs-vandalism/
Sequim Police Department detectives plan to forward charges related to student vandalism on June 1 at Sequim High School to the Clallam County Prosecutor’s Office in the coming weeks.
https://www.sequimgazette.com/news/police-to-forward-charges-in-shs-vandalism-case/
(3) Today’s article, including a thorough and easily prosecutable report by the sheriff’s dept, Under RCW 9A.48.070, Malicious Mischief in the First Degree, handed over to the prosecuting attorney and left to gather dust.