If you ever watched that show, it was based on performers who were evaluated by a panel of judges who could strike a gong to end a performance they disliked.
Lets welcome the panelists Ronald Richards, Jim Stoffer, Cindy Kelly, Alex Fane, and Andrea Williams.
Tomorrow morning, former Charter Review Commissioners and engaged residents will present both the pro and con arguments on these measures. I see the CON members, where are the PRO members? (like Jeff Tozzer?)
Question 1, panelist do you want to establish an enforceable code of ethics for elected officials?
GONG!!!
Question 2, panelist do you support regular, scheduled town halls throughout the county each year?
GONG!!!
Which ENGAGED RESIDENTS will be allowed to speak? GONG, GONG and I’ll raise you a GONG.
A code of ethics, with no real consequences for bending, or openly breaking; is nothing more than a wish-list for better behavior, written by those who know how to do the right thing, but want to continue doing wrong.
It's predictable that requiring regular public meetings of the same would be disfavored if an informed public raised ethical questions of those present, without media screening out their objections.
THE GONG SHOW?
If you ever watched that show, it was based on performers who were evaluated by a panel of judges who could strike a gong to end a performance they disliked.
Lets welcome the panelists Ronald Richards, Jim Stoffer, Cindy Kelly, Alex Fane, and Andrea Williams.
Tomorrow morning, former Charter Review Commissioners and engaged residents will present both the pro and con arguments on these measures. I see the CON members, where are the PRO members? (like Jeff Tozzer?)
Question 1, panelist do you want to establish an enforceable code of ethics for elected officials?
GONG!!!
Question 2, panelist do you support regular, scheduled town halls throughout the county each year?
GONG!!!
Which ENGAGED RESIDENTS will be allowed to speak? GONG, GONG and I’ll raise you a GONG.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwsRGV1oCvc
I am surprised they didn't invite Rondeaux or Porter.
A code of ethics, with no real consequences for bending, or openly breaking; is nothing more than a wish-list for better behavior, written by those who know how to do the right thing, but want to continue doing wrong.
It's predictable that requiring regular public meetings of the same would be disfavored if an informed public raised ethical questions of those present, without media screening out their objections.