Here is correspondence between me and Clallam County Public Health,
In May 2021, I wrote to Clallam County's public health office for the third time, asking a direct question:
"Noting that there have been over 3000 deaths in the US from COVID vaccines
and tens of thousands of severe adverse responses, the PASD is now offering
promoting child COVID vaccinations. Children have had virtually no issues with
COVID-19. Why would we be vaccinating them?"
I wasn't trafficking in rumors. I was citing VAERS, the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, a joint CDC/FDA surveillance tool. I acknowledged the database's limitations implicitly by framing it as data worth examining. I asked Dr. Berry to respond. I had done so twice before without reply. And wrote many times afterward with essentially no further response.
This was the one response I received:
"Per Dr. Berry: She has reviewed the data on children and the COVID-19 vaccine and there is no evidence of death."
One sentence. No citations. No data. No explanation of how VAERS signals are interpreted. No engagement with the documented volume of adverse event reports. No invitation to follow up. Just: no evidence.
Now consider what we now know was happening at the federal level that same month.
Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI), chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, released a 38-page report in late April 2026 titled "Unmasked: How Biden Health Officials Purposely Turned a Blind Eye Toward COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Signals." The report, backed by approximately 600 pages of internal records, documents that:
- In early 2021, FDA officials became aware of a superior, "state of the art" data mining method that could better detect safety signals from COVID-19 vaccines. They chose not to adopt it, continuing to use an older system with known limitations.
- In May 2021, the very same month I was writing my unanswered letters, internal FDA records show officials were asking: "Is VAERS signaling for myopericarditis now?" The documented answer: "For the age groups 16-17 years and 18-24 years, yes."
- In 2022, CDC officials discussed actively limiting distribution of FDA's weekly data mining reports on COVID-19 vaccines, with one CDC official writing: "I think that because of the FOIAs we may have asked FDA to stop sending these weekly data mining outputs."
- A separate FDA internal memorandum, obtained through Senator Johnson's ongoing inquiry into pediatric deaths, acknowledged that COVID-19 vaccines led to the death of at least 10 children.
Let that last point land. While Dr. Berry was assuring a concerned Clallam County resident that there was "no evidence of death," federal agencies were internally documenting pediatric deaths and actively suppressing their own safety-signal reporting infrastructure, in part to avoid FOIA exposure.
My specific number, "over 3,000 deaths" from VAERS, was always contested, and VAERS data is correlational, not causal. That is fair. But that is precisely why it required engagement, not dismissal. Even if one percent of those reported deaths reflected genuine vaccine causality, that is 30 deaths, in a population of children with documented near-zero COVID mortality risk. The question "why are we vaccinating them?" was never extreme. It was the right question. It deserved a real answer.
What Clallam County Public Health gave instead was institutional cover, whether through negligence, deference to federal messaging, or something more deliberate, we don't yet know. What we do know is that the federal agencies whose guidance local health officials were echoing were, at that same moment, internally suppressing safety signals, blocking superior monitoring systems, and restricting their own FOIA-sensitive data outputs.
The question for Clallam County residents is not just what Dr. Berry knew. It is what information she was receiving, and what information she was not receiving because agencies above her had already decided the public didn't need to know.
That is not a conspiracy theory. It is now a matter of documented Senate record.
The residents of Clallam County, and parents like me, who were trying to make informed decisions for their children, deserved better. An accounting is overdue.
And yet Dr. Berry, per her comments cited in this article, are that unknown made-up people (because she has to manufacturer the hype) want others to die because of their drug use, yet no concern for children who the government knowingly were inducing their death. Simply amazing.
How it is the Commissioners continue to tolerate her is beyond reason.
The commissioners did not respond to an email asking why they haven't followed up with the Jamestown Corporation regarding having a discussion about property and lodging taxes. Here is today's email send to the county commissioners and Dr. Allison Berry.
Dear Commissioners French, Ozias, Johnson, and Dr. Berry,
Is it now becoming standard practice to mischaracterize legitimate public concerns as people wanting addicts to “die in the street” or contract diseases?
A resident raised concerns about public disorder, addiction, crime, neighborhood impacts, and the long-term outcomes of current policies. In response, Commissioner Ozias wrote:
“If your argument is ‘let them die rather than trying to save their life with Narcan’ I would just say that I do not agree with you.”
Respectfully, where did the resident say that?
Why does public debate increasingly feel framed as either full support for current harm reduction strategies or accusations that critics are cruel, stigmatizing, or indifferent to human life?
Can county leadership acknowledge that residents can:
support treatment and recovery,
support saving lives,
support mental health care,
and still have concerns about the impacts current policies are having on the broader community?
I would also ask:
Are community impacts like public disorder, encampments, emergency calls, and discarded paraphernalia being measured alongside overdose reversals?
How many individuals using these services ultimately transition into long-term recovery?
Does the county believe there are any valid criticisms of the current harm reduction model?
Many residents are not asking for people to suffer. They are asking whether current policies are truly helping both addicts and the community as a whole.
“People Who Use Drugs Deserve To Get AIDS and Die?”
No Dr Berry, as a health office you should know the difference of life’s realities regarding drug use.
People Who Use Drugs Know They Are Taking The Chance Of Getting AIDS And Other Diseases. Supplying pamphlets on how to use drugs ‘safely’ and the tools to use them is YOU saying they deserve to die.
Good morning fellow Patriots, here we go with the Dr. Berry’s bait and switch bologna again. Personally, I think this woman is delusional but that is my own opinion. They are all running scared because is people of Clallam County I’m trying to hold them all accountable. What a statement to make that folks in general here could even make a statement about wanting people to get AIDS and other diseases from drug use. we want is accountability and measurable outcomes.
It’s completely valid to expect hard data on harm reduction and clean parks. We all want public health policies that actually work.
But wow, here we go again. Who could have possibly predicted this exact same narrative template would be rolled out for a routine Board of Health meeting?
It is just exhausting to watch this rinse-and-repeat strategy in action. Let's look at the playbook: First, take a doctor’s comment about the extreme stigma of addiction and deliberately twist it into an "explosive" accusation against local residents. Next, make sure to drag up complaints about 2020 COVID policies just to hit those old emotional triggers. Finally, throw out vague "follow the money" conspiracy theories about local clinics and tribal partnerships to imply massive corruption, all without offering a single piece of actual evidence.
This constant outrage-farming doesn’t hold anyone accountable or solve our local issues; it just burns out the community. We need to focus on actual public health metrics and practical problem-solving, not this endless cycle of manufactured political drama.
Here is correspondence between me and Clallam County Public Health,
In May 2021, I wrote to Clallam County's public health office for the third time, asking a direct question:
"Noting that there have been over 3000 deaths in the US from COVID vaccines
and tens of thousands of severe adverse responses, the PASD is now offering
promoting child COVID vaccinations. Children have had virtually no issues with
COVID-19. Why would we be vaccinating them?"
I wasn't trafficking in rumors. I was citing VAERS, the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, a joint CDC/FDA surveillance tool. I acknowledged the database's limitations implicitly by framing it as data worth examining. I asked Dr. Berry to respond. I had done so twice before without reply. And wrote many times afterward with essentially no further response.
This was the one response I received:
"Per Dr. Berry: She has reviewed the data on children and the COVID-19 vaccine and there is no evidence of death."
One sentence. No citations. No data. No explanation of how VAERS signals are interpreted. No engagement with the documented volume of adverse event reports. No invitation to follow up. Just: no evidence.
Now consider what we now know was happening at the federal level that same month.
Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI), chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, released a 38-page report in late April 2026 titled "Unmasked: How Biden Health Officials Purposely Turned a Blind Eye Toward COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Signals." The report, backed by approximately 600 pages of internal records, documents that:
- In early 2021, FDA officials became aware of a superior, "state of the art" data mining method that could better detect safety signals from COVID-19 vaccines. They chose not to adopt it, continuing to use an older system with known limitations.
- In May 2021, the very same month I was writing my unanswered letters, internal FDA records show officials were asking: "Is VAERS signaling for myopericarditis now?" The documented answer: "For the age groups 16-17 years and 18-24 years, yes."
- In 2022, CDC officials discussed actively limiting distribution of FDA's weekly data mining reports on COVID-19 vaccines, with one CDC official writing: "I think that because of the FOIAs we may have asked FDA to stop sending these weekly data mining outputs."
- A separate FDA internal memorandum, obtained through Senator Johnson's ongoing inquiry into pediatric deaths, acknowledged that COVID-19 vaccines led to the death of at least 10 children.
Let that last point land. While Dr. Berry was assuring a concerned Clallam County resident that there was "no evidence of death," federal agencies were internally documenting pediatric deaths and actively suppressing their own safety-signal reporting infrastructure, in part to avoid FOIA exposure.
My specific number, "over 3,000 deaths" from VAERS, was always contested, and VAERS data is correlational, not causal. That is fair. But that is precisely why it required engagement, not dismissal. Even if one percent of those reported deaths reflected genuine vaccine causality, that is 30 deaths, in a population of children with documented near-zero COVID mortality risk. The question "why are we vaccinating them?" was never extreme. It was the right question. It deserved a real answer.
What Clallam County Public Health gave instead was institutional cover, whether through negligence, deference to federal messaging, or something more deliberate, we don't yet know. What we do know is that the federal agencies whose guidance local health officials were echoing were, at that same moment, internally suppressing safety signals, blocking superior monitoring systems, and restricting their own FOIA-sensitive data outputs.
The question for Clallam County residents is not just what Dr. Berry knew. It is what information she was receiving, and what information she was not receiving because agencies above her had already decided the public didn't need to know.
That is not a conspiracy theory. It is now a matter of documented Senate record.
The residents of Clallam County, and parents like me, who were trying to make informed decisions for their children, deserved better. An accounting is overdue.
Dr. Berry, we deserve an apology.
And yet Dr. Berry, per her comments cited in this article, are that unknown made-up people (because she has to manufacturer the hype) want others to die because of their drug use, yet no concern for children who the government knowingly were inducing their death. Simply amazing.
How it is the Commissioners continue to tolerate her is beyond reason.
The commissioners did not respond to an email asking why they haven't followed up with the Jamestown Corporation regarding having a discussion about property and lodging taxes. Here is today's email send to the county commissioners and Dr. Allison Berry.
Dear Commissioners French, Ozias, Johnson, and Dr. Berry,
Is it now becoming standard practice to mischaracterize legitimate public concerns as people wanting addicts to “die in the street” or contract diseases?
A resident raised concerns about public disorder, addiction, crime, neighborhood impacts, and the long-term outcomes of current policies. In response, Commissioner Ozias wrote:
“If your argument is ‘let them die rather than trying to save their life with Narcan’ I would just say that I do not agree with you.”
Respectfully, where did the resident say that?
Why does public debate increasingly feel framed as either full support for current harm reduction strategies or accusations that critics are cruel, stigmatizing, or indifferent to human life?
Can county leadership acknowledge that residents can:
support treatment and recovery,
support saving lives,
support mental health care,
and still have concerns about the impacts current policies are having on the broader community?
I would also ask:
Are community impacts like public disorder, encampments, emergency calls, and discarded paraphernalia being measured alongside overdose reversals?
How many individuals using these services ultimately transition into long-term recovery?
Does the county believe there are any valid criticisms of the current harm reduction model?
Many residents are not asking for people to suffer. They are asking whether current policies are truly helping both addicts and the community as a whole.
“People Who Use Drugs Deserve To Get AIDS and Die?”
No Dr Berry, as a health office you should know the difference of life’s realities regarding drug use.
People Who Use Drugs Know They Are Taking The Chance Of Getting AIDS And Other Diseases. Supplying pamphlets on how to use drugs ‘safely’ and the tools to use them is YOU saying they deserve to die.
Hereinafter referred to as Dr. "Spin" Berry.
Good morning fellow Patriots, here we go with the Dr. Berry’s bait and switch bologna again. Personally, I think this woman is delusional but that is my own opinion. They are all running scared because is people of Clallam County I’m trying to hold them all accountable. What a statement to make that folks in general here could even make a statement about wanting people to get AIDS and other diseases from drug use. we want is accountability and measurable outcomes.
Have a good and safe day, everyone.
..While she brings back refer madness...to make us all feel safe from Jeff Spicolli...
It’s completely valid to expect hard data on harm reduction and clean parks. We all want public health policies that actually work.
But wow, here we go again. Who could have possibly predicted this exact same narrative template would be rolled out for a routine Board of Health meeting?
It is just exhausting to watch this rinse-and-repeat strategy in action. Let's look at the playbook: First, take a doctor’s comment about the extreme stigma of addiction and deliberately twist it into an "explosive" accusation against local residents. Next, make sure to drag up complaints about 2020 COVID policies just to hit those old emotional triggers. Finally, throw out vague "follow the money" conspiracy theories about local clinics and tribal partnerships to imply massive corruption, all without offering a single piece of actual evidence.
This constant outrage-farming doesn’t hold anyone accountable or solve our local issues; it just burns out the community. We need to focus on actual public health metrics and practical problem-solving, not this endless cycle of manufactured political drama.