Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Harold Crossley's avatar

Seems to me it is high time for the appropriate prosecuting agency to take a good hard look at how our county commissioners are voting to fund NGOs and the benefits those commissioners get, like trips to Washington, DC, to enhance their careers while shorting the citizens of the County.

Expand full comment
Garry Blankenship's avatar

I believe the time has come to learn the exact legal positions of tribal lands, the BIA and the relevant taxation involved. In particular; what is the legal requirement for one to be treaty entitled ? It is nit picking, but it is the insanity of discriminating on the basis of ancestry that requires proof of treaty entitlements. Contemplate how that determination is made and the absurdity of it becomes obvious. Neither those that were once treaty entitled nor those who crafted those treaties are living. So again; how do we determine who is entitled to rights and privileges above and beyond all other occupants of this land ? In order to maintain these entitlements in breeding is necessary. If not in breeding, then who is entitled ? With tribal owned land being sovereign it may become necessary that it be treated like all other sovereign nations. Passports and passport services should be required for both the non-tribal to access tribal land and for tribal to enter non-tribal land. Taken to it's logical end this process of allowing the treaty entitled to accumulate land and remove it from our tax rolls dictates there will ultimately be no County to manage. One should not be entitled to the infrastructure provided by the non treaty without paying their fair share. If it becomes necessary to embargo tribal owned business, it can be arranged.

Expand full comment
60 more comments...

No posts