The Commissioners and Director Emery did not answer yesterday's question regarding the dismissal of public commenters. Here is today's email to the commissioners:
Dear Commissioners,
Clallam County taxpayers fund WSAC with hundreds of thousands of dollars, and WSAC is actively lobbying for new local taxing authority under HB 2559 — while two of you sit in WSAC leadership roles. Why wasn’t this tax push discussed locally before WSAC testified in favor of it, did Clallam County ever authorize WSAC to support this bill, and at what point does WSAC stop being “representation” and start being a taxpayer-funded lobbying arm? How do you separate your roles as commissioners from your WSAC leadership positions when those policies directly affect the same residents funding that organization, and will you commit going forward to publicly airing and debating any WSAC-backed tax proposals locally before taxpayer dollars are used to advocate for them in Olympia?
The following is an example of how an individual county commissioner could respond to this question through a good-governance lens grounded in Washington law, public accountability standards, and transparency best practices.
Dear Constituent,
Thank you for raising this question. It goes directly to transparency, authorization, and public trust.
Clallam County does fund the Washington State Association of Counties (WSAC), and WSAC engages in legislative advocacy on behalf of its members. Under Washington law, however, policy authority remains with the locally elected Board of County Commissioners, not with an association (RCW 36.32.120; RCW 36.32.230). WSAC does not have independent authority to bind Clallam County to legislative positions absent local authorization.
You are correct that WSAC’s support for HB 2559, which would authorize new local taxing options, was not explicitly discussed or debated by the Board prior to WSAC testimony. While commissioners who serve in WSAC leadership roles may participate in association discussions, that participation does not substitute for local deliberation or formal Board action—particularly when the policy directly affects local taxpayers.
I do want to acknowledge that commissioners have increased disclosure of their external affiliations in recent months, including through individual commissioner reports and prior resolutions. That shift reflects sustained public engagement, correspondence, meeting attendance, and scrutiny by local media. However, disclosure alone is not a governance system. Best-practice guidance makes clear that accountability requires documented discussion, clear authorization, and a public record of the governing body's action—or inaction—as a whole (Government Accountability Office [GAO], 2015; Municipal Research and Services Center [MRSC], n.d.).
Absent a consistent, public-facing mechanism to track when association-backed proposals have been formally considered, it can reasonably appear that policy positions are being advanced without local authorization. That perception undermines trust and places individual commissioners in an untenable position.
Speaking only for myself as an individual commissioner, I support the following commitments:
1. Local airing before advocacy
WSAC-backed proposals involving a new taxing authority or material local impact should be publicly discussed by the Board before WSAC advocates on the County’s behalf.
2. Clear authorization standards
Board positions should be reflected in documented discussion and, where appropriate, a motion or resolution consistent with the Open Public Meetings Act (RCW 42.30.020).
3. Role clarity
Service in association leadership roles does not replace local policy authority and does not commit the County absent Board action.
4. Public issue tracking
A simple, public-facing system to track questions raised, actions taken, and issues pending Board consideration would benefit both the public and the commissioners.
Representation becomes lobbying when advocacy is disconnected from local authorization. Good governance closes that gap through structure, documentation, and public process—not intent alone.
Sincerely,
Commissioner
Clallam County Board of Commissioners
References
Government Accountability Office. (2015). Standards for internal control in the federal government (GAO-14-704G).
Citation note: All statutory, regulatory, and guidance sources cited above were selected to be publicly accessible, non-paywalled, and verifiable by any member of the public. Links were checked at the time of publication to ensure they resolve directly to the cited material for independent review.
When institutions stop naming roles, standards, and responsibilities clearly, the public fills the gaps with suspicion — and no amount of good intent can outrun bad structure.
Good governance is not proven by effort, credentials, or outcomes in isolation.
It is proven by clarity: who is speaking, in what role, with what authority, and under what rules.
When lines blur between advocacy and reporting, policy and opinion, compassion and accountability, the system doesn’t fail loudly — it fails quietly, through confusion. And confusion is where trust erodes.
Transparency is not an attack.
Disclosure is not hostility.
Questions are not disloyalty.
They are the maintenance work of a functioning public system.
There are so many oxymoron’s in today’s articles, starting with the visual oxymoron of homeless people passed out in front of the County Courthouse hidden within trash.
Then there’s the investigation of the man, Brian Parker who is now responsible for ruling on civil protection orders who is himself the subject of stalking accusations and was previously arrested by the Everett Police Department for First Degree Perjury.
There’s so much more. It’s like one of those questions asking “Can you find 16 objects hidden in the picture?”
SO, IS CLALLAM COUNTY ROTTING FROM THE INSIDE OUT? READ THIS:
Clallam County Superior Court Commissioner Brian Parker Accused of Stalking in Port Angeles; Arrested by Everett Police for Felony Perjury
When Brian Parker took the bench as a Clallam County Superior Court Commissioner on January 13, 2025, he was entrusted with significant judicial authority by then-Presiding Judge Basden, who APPOINTED HIM TO THE POSITION
Court commissioners are UNELECTED IN WASHINGTON STATE They serve at the pleasure of the judge who appoints them.
In this role, Parker exercises substantial power over the lives of Washington residents. Parker presides over most CIVIL PROTECTION ORDER HEARING and FAMILY LAW MATTERS. He also presides over the JUVENILE COURT, handles some initial hearings in CRIMINAL MATTERS, issues ARREST WARRANTS, and he issues the initial orders in most EVICTION PROCEEDINGS in the county.
Yet court commissioners are NEVER ACCOUNTABLE to the voters, despite holding substantial judicial power and authority over the LIVES, LIBERTY, and PROPERTY of the people of Washington.
cronyism
noun
1. the appointment of friends and associates to positions of authority, without proper regard to their qualifications
Denise, I like that phrasing. There’s incestuous political affairs going on everywhere! Time for castration and spaying…. Yes, we need a healthier governing gene pool, otherwise we'll have abnormalities like THE HILLS HAVE EYES. oops, there is already political cannibalism. We could do some head shrinking. There's enough bigheaded people to choose from. Sorry, but I dibs the head shrinking first ; )
I strongly encourage anyone who is struggling to understand what REALLY is going on in our community, America, and for that matter "the world", to take a few minutes to read about "Alinsky" and his well-known (infamous) roadmap to undermine America and in fact civilized society "from within"~! Anyone who doubts that "we" (Americans & humanity) are under a ruthless attack that has been ongoing for many decades, needs to IMMEDIATELY look into "Alinsky's" detailed plan of attack that has been, and is still being, followed step by step by the criminals in our government and general population~! Keep up the great work Jennifer~!
HB 2559 is moving quickly in the House Finance Committee.
This post walks through what the bill would actually do in a rural community like Forks, how it would affect short-term rentals and visitors, and what targeted amendments could make it more fiscally efficient, transparent, and workable for small jurisdictions. Rather than arguing for or against the bill, this is a practical, finance-focused look at what would move the needle before the executive session.
Thank you for considering HB 2559. I appreciate the bill’s local-option structure, dedication of revenue to housing-related purposes, and state-administered collection, all of which reduce administrative burden and preserve local discretion.
I write from Forks in Clallam County, a rural gateway community that has experienced record visitation and record lodging tax collections in recent years. While this strengthens the potential revenue base for the optional tax authorized in HB 2559, it also highlights the importance of ensuring the tool is scalable, transparent, and administratively efficient for small jurisdictions.
From a finance and implementation perspective, I respectfully suggest the following narrow amendments, all within the existing scope of the bill:
1. Clarify regional and interlocal use of funds
Issue: Small cities may generate limited revenue relative to housing need and lack the scale to operate stand-alone programs.
Suggested amendment
Section 1(3)(c) — add clarifying language: “A county, city, or town imposing the tax authorized under this section may enter into an interlocal agreement under chapter 39.34 RCW with another county, city, or town, including for the purpose of addressing regional housing needs or pooling resources where individual jurisdictions lack sufficient revenue capacity.”
Why this matters to Finance:
Improves cost efficiency and avoids fragmented, low-impact programs.
2. Specify minimum elements for the annual public report
Issue: The bill requires annual reporting but does not define baseline financial or outcome elements, which can reduce transparency and comparability.
Suggested amendment
Section 1(4) — add a subsection: “The annual report must include, at a minimum:
(a) Total revenue collected;
(b) Amount expended by authorized use category;
(c) Percentage of revenue used for administrative costs; and
(d) A general description of households or housing units assisted, where applicable.”
Why this matters to Finance:
Supports accountability without prescribing program design.
3. Reinforce administrative cost guardrails
Issue: The 15 percent administrative allowance is reasonable, but clarification helps maintain public trust.
Suggested amendment
Section 1(3)(b) — add one sentence: “Administrative costs retained under this subsection must be directly related to the administration or delivery of programs authorized under this section.”
Why this matters to Finance:
Reduces risk of fund diversion and audit concerns.
Issue: Taxation alone may not shift units from short-term to long-term use; regulatory risk is a significant driver of housing supply decisions.
Suggested addition
New intent subsection (non-operative): “It is the intent of the legislature that revenue tools authorized under this act be considered alongside regulatory and incentive-based approaches that encourage the conversion of short-term rental units to long-term residential housing, particularly in rural and tourist-impacted communities.”
Why this matters to Finance:
Signals that HB 2559 is one tool in a broader housing strategy without expanding the bill’s scope or amending landlord-tenant law.
Clarification on scope
I do not recommend amending landlord-tenant statutes within HB 2559. However, pairing this bill with future, narrowly tailored supply-side incentives—such as voluntary, mutual flexibility in month-to-month tenancies—would better align behavioral incentives with housing goals, particularly for small landlords in rural communities.
HB 2559 is a useful optional tool. These limited refinements would strengthen implementation, fiscal accountability, and usability for communities like Forks and other rural jurisdictions.
My friend of 48 years died of a opioid overdose in a homeless encampment this month. She was one day away from turning 63. No shelter, program, rehab, meeting, prayer, loving family pep talk, meeting up with friends, offers of a bedroom in friends and family homes changed her mind to get and stay sober. She died in a small tent under an overpass alongside of interstate 80. The encampment had been cleaned and cleared of RV’s 12 months prior.
I don’t know what the answer is but a well run program, safe place to park, methadone, Suboxone, Ayahuasca brew ceremony, celebrate recovery, narcotics anonymous, psychiatrist, counselor, affordable housing wasn’t it.
Wow! Personally, having watched the drug epedemic up close since powder cocaine. I believe there's no fix that we can imagine. A segment of society is sick, for a variety of reasons, and this is reality. Sooner or later we're all going to have a shit story, and we're actually helpless.
I have a shit story! In November Katy Carl of Pierce county was arrested and charges dismissed after stealing prescribed drugs. On January 7th, she drove her truck high on Meth. Crossed the median and hit my best friends son head on. Jaecob will never be the same. He's been in a coma ever since. Yesterday morning January 26th at 3:49am after Katy Carl was released from Harbor View, she got in her car high again and hit 2 more cars! This is Washington state. So while she may face up to 10 years for vehicular assault and DUI my dear Jaecob will serve life at Kindred hospital on a ventilator.
It is! We cant escape suffering in this life but when its so damn senseless and we live in a state so soft on users, its mind boggling. Im also sorry about your friend!
Thank you. This outcome is one we all knew could happen but tried different ways to intervene. Both of her adult son’s paid for a private rehab twice. It was a volunteer from the nearby shelter that kept tabs on her. She wouldn’t go there. She sometimes slept in his car when the weather got too cold. She had overdosed nine months prior and a few doses of Narcan brought her back. There was a missing person report filed so a LE let that info slip. I know there’re people who want to get off of the streets but addicts and mentally ill are challenging. Having accountability for these programs is warranted. Years ago when she became a client at the methadone clinic they paved the way for her. They made it so easy. Her counselor told me it was a way to help her stay off of the streets. I was young and naïve but I knew they saw her as money in their pocket. The counselor was a recovered addict with a certificate from who knows where. This was in the 90’s.
It’s still pretty raw. I appreciate your kind words.
A little harsh on B&G Club and Habitat. Most everyone knows that the authors of the columns are the executive directors and the text of the pieces using "we, us, and our" indicates they represent the organizations. Their columns actually transmit good news for the community... So I don't think they are the ones to attack, Just because the gazette did not do the little footnote under the column that so and so is the executive director of such and such. Michael Smith, Executive Director of Sequim Senior Services, dba Shipley Center, who was also invited to write a column that debuts tomorrow.
For me the message is clear, the facts are the facts, this has nothing to do with the organizations and everything to do with how local media operates. Not everyone knows who these people are either and that's actually the rub. When the SG engages in obfuscation like this it gives cover to those who they let write an article for them when it is controversial. Heck, even Jake Seegers clearly identifies himself, and that's where I'm headed. For me it isn't about the Boys and Girls club, it's about the widespread cover given so that when Commissioner Ozias or other politicians write a long-winded, ambling, throw the scent off articles that we all know who that politician is, and that it's opinion.
It's all about basic responsibility of the media to clearly identify their work. They do so when one of their reporters writes a piece, or reprint a syndicated article. This isn't difficult.
And the media needs to identify any “advertorial” pieces that are actually paid display advertising. I worked for papers that occasionally ran what looked like editorial copy when it was paid display advertising. It’s hard to turn down paid advertising, even when it turns your stomach. Editors don’t usually have a voice in these decisions that more often come from ad directors and publishers. That being said, is the county paying the papers to run Ozias’ crapola?
As a parent, it gets so overwhelming to read constantly about so many out of town (repeat) offenders in Port Angeles/Clallam County. Not to mention many have been jailed for serious felonies, which is highly concerning as a parent. If nothing else, this should be one major motivator to get a lot of “normie” busy parents out there to educate themselves enough to see what is happening all around them to want real change in our leadership this fall.
I have been in professional media for 50 years and promise you that not clearly identifying any potential conflicts of interest by authors of advertorials - which is what the two referenced articles are - is severely frowned upon. Not saying they don't convey some good news for the community, that is not the point. The newspaper can easily have a reporter interview the authors are write the same story while perhaps asking a question or two about any potential negatives, thus making it now a news story and not an opinion piece produced by an interested party. The real kick is allowed Commissioner Ozias to pen a weekly column, without offering someone with an opposing viewpoint the same regular opportunity.
Great story and great work. It is my opinion that both the Sequim Gazette & Peninsula Daily News are only good for fish wrappers, (even for that, they have even priced themselves out of that market). They have the same problem as all the Franchise and National Media Companies, they refuse to tell the truth. In my opinion they are paid off by political groups, special interest groups and politicians. When these groups or individuals start using these Media outlets to write their own stories on what they are doing instead of actually doing the interviewing, it tells exactly what the media is. It would be refreshing to actually have these papers do some serious reporting and start asking the tough questions so those in-charge have to answer them. I look at the Local, State and National Media as the Soviet Style PolutBuro. Someone has to run cover for the politicians in power and sell the NORMIES the lies that their politicians are doing the best they can for them. This platform as well as a few others typically share the truth. This definitely helps shed sunlight on issues and I believe it is having an affect. Thank you CCWD, Clallamity Jen, Strait Shooter, Clallam County Letters & Sequim Monitor.
"The Washington Legislature is considering HB 2559, which would allow cities and counties (starting April 1, 2027) to impose a local excise tax up to 4% on short-term rentals to fund affordable housing." Can someone please define for me what "affordable housing" is? It's a term thrown around regularly, yet no one can seem to produce a measurable number that could define whether a program to support "affordable housing" is a success or failure. does it mean that a young single person working a minimum wage job should be able to afford a home? Or a retiree afford a townhouse? Or the mythical married couple with two kids and a dog afford a 3 bedroom, two bath home on a small lot in town? How do you define the term, and then measure any results you seek with more tax money??
“Affordable housing” is housing where a household pays no more than 30 percent of its gross income on housing costs. For renters this includes rent plus utilities and for owners it includes mortgage, taxes, insurance, and basic fees. Those income limits are tied to something called Area Median Income (AMI). AMI is calculated each year by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for every county and household size is taken into consideration. For a single person household in Clallam County, an income of $48,000 would allow for a monthly housing cost of $1,200.
There’s essentially two types of “affordable housing.” The first one and the one used for writing policies is based on the AMI of the County. The second is your personal "affordable housing” which is based on your personal income. One person’s affordability is another's unobtainable. Working for minimum wage 40 hours a week every week earns a gross income of $35,630. A single person household earning the minimum wage with 40 hours a week could afford $990 a month. Anything above that is classed as housing burdened.
If someone is BUYING a home, Lenders typically look for a debt-to-income (DTI) ratio of 36% or less for a home loan, though ratios up to 43%-50% may be accepted depending on the loan type (e.g., FHA, VA) and applicant creditworthiness. DTI is calculated by dividing total monthly debt payments (including the new mortgage) by gross monthly income. So, it could be that 30% is not a definite number for buying property.
But the "Afordable Housing" that we are talking about in this case, is housing on land THAT IS OWNED BY THE COUNTY. Low income people have to qualify. This is not 'afordable housing' that low income people are buying. It is paid for by taxpayers and parsed out by the County, according to people who qualify. It is RENTING.
Drew, thank you for the information. So far the "affordable housing" being built isn't being done. You are the first to address this rather stretched out wording called "affordable housing" Keep it up, it really needs to be addressed. Find what is being built now under "affordable housing" It isn't happening. Thank you again!!!!
PS The figures don't include health insurance cost for people who just go over the limit for medicaid. Figure at least $800 to $2,000 (a month) for a single male who has to pay if they aren't covered under their jobs.
And the Legislature is considering a bill that would further tie the hands of local governments that want to clean up homeless encampments. I think they push some version of this in every legislative session, like Groundhog Day.
SomeSome, You are right, the way it is presented, face value, it sounds fair, but what actually happens: The streets become lawless
Under the bill, SHELTER WOULD HAVE TO ALLOW PETS, PARTNERS, AND PERSONAL BELONGINGS. Programs that REQUIRE SOBRIETY, PARTICIPATION IN TREATMENT, OR COMPLIANCE WITH CERTAIN BEHAVIORAL RULES COULD BE DEEMED INADEQUATE, BARRING CITIES FROM RELYING ON THOSE OPTIONS TO JUSTIFY ENFORCEMENT !!!!!
• That would effectively mean police "cannot clear blocked sidewalks, address fire hazards under overpasses, or ensure public access to public spaces," Lowe said.
I would like to clarify some information regarding the arrest of Roman Penn.
Yes he was arrested after leaving work. He was profiled, and arrested for DUI. Do you know why? Because the arresting state patrol officer seen an unopened Narcan in his vehicle. I carry Narcan and gloves in my purse because I never know what kind of situation I will run into and would rather help someone than leave them to die.
Upon his arrest, he requested a blood test. Blood testing takes a long time to process. His probation officer came down to the jail to violate him and gave him a UA, THAT CAME BACK CLEAN! AND HE WAS RELEASED!
Roman has been doing excellent since the interview with King 5
He has been working and trying!
I usually really love your articles, but was super bummed to see you insinuating about the un warranted arrest of Roman.
He's been doing great and deserves our support, not our scrutiny.
Actually SC, I would like an interview with you. Over the years you have been extremely open, have knowledge of areas I don't and are so frank and unassuming it makes me believe in you. If you believe in Roman, so do I. You don't back a losing horse!
I am not following how he was "profiled" for having Narcan in the vehicle while driving. If you are saying he was racially or otherwise profiled to be pulled over by LE, that's a serious accusation
I'm not sure on the initial pull over reason. I want to say it was speeding, but am not 100% on that.
When the officer came up to the window, he saw unopened Narcan and more than likely recognized Rome from his previous encounters in drug abuse.
He asked him to do a sobriety test, and Roman had just finished a construction job so I guess did not pass which resulted in his arrest. That and he requested a blood analysis because he knew he was clean.
I know a majority of construction workers in the our county because my husband has been working in that industry for the last 30 years. Not any of those men who work those hours bracing walls and standing on ladders all day will be able to walk a straight line after work.
He is a rare occurrence example of using the current system for what it is intended for.
Thank you for sharing the Strait Shooter article! What you say is what the Strait Shooter Staff cares most about — highlight the failure of governance, and there isn’t a shortage of inspiration in Clallam County!
When you feed Pigeons you get more Pigeons. With our political representatives wasting taxes and resources on unsolvable discrimination it is time to make the customers of law enforcement pay for their law enforcement. If a criminal cannot pay for the system costs to incarcerate and/or adjudicate their crimes, they can stay incarcerated. Less costly to keep them in jail than to pay all the law enforcement system costs repeatedly for the same criminal. Force criminals to live in jail or force criminals to live a life they do not want that harms society. You choose.
Great article today, Jeff. A lot of information to pass along. This WSAC is one to keep a really close eye on. And you, Jeff, have never taken your eye off of that organization. The messaging from WSAC resembles the DCD's. Clear as mud. Q&A forum today at the BoCC 10:00 Regular Meeting. See you there!
A lot to take in over my coffee. Great job! We have a problem that the commissioners refuse to acknowledge their Harm program tied with our lax state enforcement of laws lead to our current environment that they tell everyone how great they've made things for citizens of Clallam County. Fix by government on the fix....hmmm.
Please keep it up Jeff.
Thanks for more light in otherwise topics buried in the dark. Have a great day.
P.S. You mentioned Strait signs and I picked an extra one for a commenter that wanted a postcard sized one....I failed to get his name and looked back to the article and couldn't find him. Any chance of hooking him up. I'll take it anywhere for delivery. Thanks
I'm not sure what to make of the STR tax issue, if we limit the discussion to taxation. I'm a fan of use-tax vs flat-tax. STR taxes nationally range up to 15-18%. Those who are visiting Clallam County are getting a bargain, and tourism is a big part of our tax base. The clear rub? When an elected official is taking on a quasi-conflict of interest position while serving on in an official capacity of another organization then they have a responsibility to distinguish those roles, to their electorate. Especially given that they likely would not be part of the other organization if it was not for their electorate getting them their public position as well as our tax dollars paying for their membership in theis organization.
Another aspect to consider. Is the OPMA being skirted by all of the BOCCC being part of WASAC where they do have discussions on matters that affect the public?
Given Olympia has seen fit to put over 1,000 bills on the agenda for their 2026 session one has to do with forcing jurisdictions to offer and make available living space for the "homeless" otherwise arresting someone for "living on the streets" in violation of a possible ordinance cannot be enforced. Aside from the work around to the recent Grant's Pass ruling, it appears that PA won't have a problem complying with the empty beds noted at Serenity House.
The Commissioners and Director Emery did not answer yesterday's question regarding the dismissal of public commenters. Here is today's email to the commissioners:
Dear Commissioners,
Clallam County taxpayers fund WSAC with hundreds of thousands of dollars, and WSAC is actively lobbying for new local taxing authority under HB 2559 — while two of you sit in WSAC leadership roles. Why wasn’t this tax push discussed locally before WSAC testified in favor of it, did Clallam County ever authorize WSAC to support this bill, and at what point does WSAC stop being “representation” and start being a taxpayer-funded lobbying arm? How do you separate your roles as commissioners from your WSAC leadership positions when those policies directly affect the same residents funding that organization, and will you commit going forward to publicly airing and debating any WSAC-backed tax proposals locally before taxpayer dollars are used to advocate for them in Olympia?
All three commissioners can be reached by emailing the Clerk of the Board at loni.gores@clallamcountywa.gov
The following is an example of how an individual county commissioner could respond to this question through a good-governance lens grounded in Washington law, public accountability standards, and transparency best practices.
Dear Constituent,
Thank you for raising this question. It goes directly to transparency, authorization, and public trust.
Clallam County does fund the Washington State Association of Counties (WSAC), and WSAC engages in legislative advocacy on behalf of its members. Under Washington law, however, policy authority remains with the locally elected Board of County Commissioners, not with an association (RCW 36.32.120; RCW 36.32.230). WSAC does not have independent authority to bind Clallam County to legislative positions absent local authorization.
You are correct that WSAC’s support for HB 2559, which would authorize new local taxing options, was not explicitly discussed or debated by the Board prior to WSAC testimony. While commissioners who serve in WSAC leadership roles may participate in association discussions, that participation does not substitute for local deliberation or formal Board action—particularly when the policy directly affects local taxpayers.
I do want to acknowledge that commissioners have increased disclosure of their external affiliations in recent months, including through individual commissioner reports and prior resolutions. That shift reflects sustained public engagement, correspondence, meeting attendance, and scrutiny by local media. However, disclosure alone is not a governance system. Best-practice guidance makes clear that accountability requires documented discussion, clear authorization, and a public record of the governing body's action—or inaction—as a whole (Government Accountability Office [GAO], 2015; Municipal Research and Services Center [MRSC], n.d.).
Absent a consistent, public-facing mechanism to track when association-backed proposals have been formally considered, it can reasonably appear that policy positions are being advanced without local authorization. That perception undermines trust and places individual commissioners in an untenable position.
Speaking only for myself as an individual commissioner, I support the following commitments:
1. Local airing before advocacy
WSAC-backed proposals involving a new taxing authority or material local impact should be publicly discussed by the Board before WSAC advocates on the County’s behalf.
2. Clear authorization standards
Board positions should be reflected in documented discussion and, where appropriate, a motion or resolution consistent with the Open Public Meetings Act (RCW 42.30.020).
3. Role clarity
Service in association leadership roles does not replace local policy authority and does not commit the County absent Board action.
4. Public issue tracking
A simple, public-facing system to track questions raised, actions taken, and issues pending Board consideration would benefit both the public and the commissioners.
Representation becomes lobbying when advocacy is disconnected from local authorization. Good governance closes that gap through structure, documentation, and public process—not intent alone.
Sincerely,
Commissioner
Clallam County Board of Commissioners
References
Government Accountability Office. (2015). Standards for internal control in the federal government (GAO-14-704G).
https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-14-704g
Municipal Research and Services Center. (n.d.). Associations and intergovernmental relations.
https://mrsc.org/explore-topics/government-operations/officials-and-employees/associations-and-intergovernmental-relations
Municipal Research and Services Center. (n.d.). Open Public Meetings Act (OPMA) basics.
https://mrsc.org/explore-topics/government-operations/public-meetings/opma/open-public-meetings-act-basics
Revised Code of Washington § 36.32.120. Powers and duties of boards of county commissioners.
https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=36.32.120
Revised Code of Washington § 36.32.230. Intergovernmental cooperation.
https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=36.32.230
Revised Code of Washington § 42.30.020. Open Public Meetings Act—Definitions.
https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=42.30.020
Citation note: All statutory, regulatory, and guidance sources cited above were selected to be publicly accessible, non-paywalled, and verifiable by any member of the public. Links were checked at the time of publication to ensure they resolve directly to the cited material for independent review.
Good Governance Daily Proverb
When institutions stop naming roles, standards, and responsibilities clearly, the public fills the gaps with suspicion — and no amount of good intent can outrun bad structure.
Good governance is not proven by effort, credentials, or outcomes in isolation.
It is proven by clarity: who is speaking, in what role, with what authority, and under what rules.
When lines blur between advocacy and reporting, policy and opinion, compassion and accountability, the system doesn’t fail loudly — it fails quietly, through confusion. And confusion is where trust erodes.
Transparency is not an attack.
Disclosure is not hostility.
Questions are not disloyalty.
They are the maintenance work of a functioning public system.
There are so many oxymoron’s in today’s articles, starting with the visual oxymoron of homeless people passed out in front of the County Courthouse hidden within trash.
Then there’s the investigation of the man, Brian Parker who is now responsible for ruling on civil protection orders who is himself the subject of stalking accusations and was previously arrested by the Everett Police Department for First Degree Perjury.
There’s so much more. It’s like one of those questions asking “Can you find 16 objects hidden in the picture?”
SO, IS CLALLAM COUNTY ROTTING FROM THE INSIDE OUT? READ THIS:
https://www.olympicherald.com/p/clallam-county-superior-court-commissioner
Clallam County Superior Court Commissioner Brian Parker Accused of Stalking in Port Angeles; Arrested by Everett Police for Felony Perjury
When Brian Parker took the bench as a Clallam County Superior Court Commissioner on January 13, 2025, he was entrusted with significant judicial authority by then-Presiding Judge Basden, who APPOINTED HIM TO THE POSITION
Court commissioners are UNELECTED IN WASHINGTON STATE They serve at the pleasure of the judge who appoints them.
In this role, Parker exercises substantial power over the lives of Washington residents. Parker presides over most CIVIL PROTECTION ORDER HEARING and FAMILY LAW MATTERS. He also presides over the JUVENILE COURT, handles some initial hearings in CRIMINAL MATTERS, issues ARREST WARRANTS, and he issues the initial orders in most EVICTION PROCEEDINGS in the county.
Yet court commissioners are NEVER ACCOUNTABLE to the voters, despite holding substantial judicial power and authority over the LIVES, LIBERTY, and PROPERTY of the people of Washington.
cronyism
noun
1. the appointment of friends and associates to positions of authority, without proper regard to their qualifications
This incestuous pool is rapidly producing abnormalities. New genes are desperately needed to help save Clallam County from extinction.
Denise, I like that phrasing. There’s incestuous political affairs going on everywhere! Time for castration and spaying…. Yes, we need a healthier governing gene pool, otherwise we'll have abnormalities like THE HILLS HAVE EYES. oops, there is already political cannibalism. We could do some head shrinking. There's enough bigheaded people to choose from. Sorry, but I dibs the head shrinking first ; )
I still like our earlier references to "Invasion of the Body Snatchers." The original, of course.
E T F
How about just end the fraud ?
WOW! Shocked and in disbelief!
Very good Patriot Jennifer~!
I strongly encourage anyone who is struggling to understand what REALLY is going on in our community, America, and for that matter "the world", to take a few minutes to read about "Alinsky" and his well-known (infamous) roadmap to undermine America and in fact civilized society "from within"~! Anyone who doubts that "we" (Americans & humanity) are under a ruthless attack that has been ongoing for many decades, needs to IMMEDIATELY look into "Alinsky's" detailed plan of attack that has been, and is still being, followed step by step by the criminals in our government and general population~! Keep up the great work Jennifer~!
Sincerely, Mike
HB 2559 is moving quickly in the House Finance Committee.
This post walks through what the bill would actually do in a rural community like Forks, how it would affect short-term rentals and visitors, and what targeted amendments could make it more fiscally efficient, transparent, and workable for small jurisdictions. Rather than arguing for or against the bill, this is a practical, finance-focused look at what would move the needle before the executive session.
👉 Comment on HB 2559 (House Finance Committee):
https://app.leg.wa.gov/pbc/bill/2559
Thank you for considering HB 2559. I appreciate the bill’s local-option structure, dedication of revenue to housing-related purposes, and state-administered collection, all of which reduce administrative burden and preserve local discretion.
I write from Forks in Clallam County, a rural gateway community that has experienced record visitation and record lodging tax collections in recent years. While this strengthens the potential revenue base for the optional tax authorized in HB 2559, it also highlights the importance of ensuring the tool is scalable, transparent, and administratively efficient for small jurisdictions.
From a finance and implementation perspective, I respectfully suggest the following narrow amendments, all within the existing scope of the bill:
1. Clarify regional and interlocal use of funds
Issue: Small cities may generate limited revenue relative to housing need and lack the scale to operate stand-alone programs.
Suggested amendment
Section 1(3)(c) — add clarifying language: “A county, city, or town imposing the tax authorized under this section may enter into an interlocal agreement under chapter 39.34 RCW with another county, city, or town, including for the purpose of addressing regional housing needs or pooling resources where individual jurisdictions lack sufficient revenue capacity.”
Why this matters to Finance:
Improves cost efficiency and avoids fragmented, low-impact programs.
2. Specify minimum elements for the annual public report
Issue: The bill requires annual reporting but does not define baseline financial or outcome elements, which can reduce transparency and comparability.
Suggested amendment
Section 1(4) — add a subsection: “The annual report must include, at a minimum:
(a) Total revenue collected;
(b) Amount expended by authorized use category;
(c) Percentage of revenue used for administrative costs; and
(d) A general description of households or housing units assisted, where applicable.”
Why this matters to Finance:
Supports accountability without prescribing program design.
3. Reinforce administrative cost guardrails
Issue: The 15 percent administrative allowance is reasonable, but clarification helps maintain public trust.
Suggested amendment
Section 1(3)(b) — add one sentence: “Administrative costs retained under this subsection must be directly related to the administration or delivery of programs authorized under this section.”
Why this matters to Finance:
Reduces risk of fund diversion and audit concerns.
4. Add legislative intent recognizing supply-side incentives
Issue: Taxation alone may not shift units from short-term to long-term use; regulatory risk is a significant driver of housing supply decisions.
Suggested addition
New intent subsection (non-operative): “It is the intent of the legislature that revenue tools authorized under this act be considered alongside regulatory and incentive-based approaches that encourage the conversion of short-term rental units to long-term residential housing, particularly in rural and tourist-impacted communities.”
Why this matters to Finance:
Signals that HB 2559 is one tool in a broader housing strategy without expanding the bill’s scope or amending landlord-tenant law.
Clarification on scope
I do not recommend amending landlord-tenant statutes within HB 2559. However, pairing this bill with future, narrowly tailored supply-side incentives—such as voluntary, mutual flexibility in month-to-month tenancies—would better align behavioral incentives with housing goals, particularly for small landlords in rural communities.
HB 2559 is a useful optional tool. These limited refinements would strengthen implementation, fiscal accountability, and usability for communities like Forks and other rural jurisdictions.
Respectfully,
Dr. Sarah
My friend of 48 years died of a opioid overdose in a homeless encampment this month. She was one day away from turning 63. No shelter, program, rehab, meeting, prayer, loving family pep talk, meeting up with friends, offers of a bedroom in friends and family homes changed her mind to get and stay sober. She died in a small tent under an overpass alongside of interstate 80. The encampment had been cleaned and cleared of RV’s 12 months prior.
I don’t know what the answer is but a well run program, safe place to park, methadone, Suboxone, Ayahuasca brew ceremony, celebrate recovery, narcotics anonymous, psychiatrist, counselor, affordable housing wasn’t it.
Wow! Personally, having watched the drug epedemic up close since powder cocaine. I believe there's no fix that we can imagine. A segment of society is sick, for a variety of reasons, and this is reality. Sooner or later we're all going to have a shit story, and we're actually helpless.
I have a shit story! In November Katy Carl of Pierce county was arrested and charges dismissed after stealing prescribed drugs. On January 7th, she drove her truck high on Meth. Crossed the median and hit my best friends son head on. Jaecob will never be the same. He's been in a coma ever since. Yesterday morning January 26th at 3:49am after Katy Carl was released from Harbor View, she got in her car high again and hit 2 more cars! This is Washington state. So while she may face up to 10 years for vehicular assault and DUI my dear Jaecob will serve life at Kindred hospital on a ventilator.
Lori, these stories are the ones untold. One success story (rare) of a recovering addict trumps the many tragedies of an upside down court system.
Thank you sharing. Too painful and too tragic.
Oh my gosh that’s so sad. Truly heartbreaking.
It is! We cant escape suffering in this life but when its so damn senseless and we live in a state so soft on users, its mind boggling. Im also sorry about your friend!
Jaecobs car! Im so sick over this!
I think you’re right.
I'm sorry your friend passed. It seems she had caring friends and family.
Thank you. This outcome is one we all knew could happen but tried different ways to intervene. Both of her adult son’s paid for a private rehab twice. It was a volunteer from the nearby shelter that kept tabs on her. She wouldn’t go there. She sometimes slept in his car when the weather got too cold. She had overdosed nine months prior and a few doses of Narcan brought her back. There was a missing person report filed so a LE let that info slip. I know there’re people who want to get off of the streets but addicts and mentally ill are challenging. Having accountability for these programs is warranted. Years ago when she became a client at the methadone clinic they paved the way for her. They made it so easy. Her counselor told me it was a way to help her stay off of the streets. I was young and naïve but I knew they saw her as money in their pocket. The counselor was a recovered addict with a certificate from who knows where. This was in the 90’s.
It’s still pretty raw. I appreciate your kind words.
A little harsh on B&G Club and Habitat. Most everyone knows that the authors of the columns are the executive directors and the text of the pieces using "we, us, and our" indicates they represent the organizations. Their columns actually transmit good news for the community... So I don't think they are the ones to attack, Just because the gazette did not do the little footnote under the column that so and so is the executive director of such and such. Michael Smith, Executive Director of Sequim Senior Services, dba Shipley Center, who was also invited to write a column that debuts tomorrow.
For me the message is clear, the facts are the facts, this has nothing to do with the organizations and everything to do with how local media operates. Not everyone knows who these people are either and that's actually the rub. When the SG engages in obfuscation like this it gives cover to those who they let write an article for them when it is controversial. Heck, even Jake Seegers clearly identifies himself, and that's where I'm headed. For me it isn't about the Boys and Girls club, it's about the widespread cover given so that when Commissioner Ozias or other politicians write a long-winded, ambling, throw the scent off articles that we all know who that politician is, and that it's opinion.
It's all about basic responsibility of the media to clearly identify their work. They do so when one of their reporters writes a piece, or reprint a syndicated article. This isn't difficult.
And the media needs to identify any “advertorial” pieces that are actually paid display advertising. I worked for papers that occasionally ran what looked like editorial copy when it was paid display advertising. It’s hard to turn down paid advertising, even when it turns your stomach. Editors don’t usually have a voice in these decisions that more often come from ad directors and publishers. That being said, is the county paying the papers to run Ozias’ crapola?
Good question, but I don't know.
It doesn’t make it OK as I’d hate to see the county blowing tax funds on that.
As a parent, it gets so overwhelming to read constantly about so many out of town (repeat) offenders in Port Angeles/Clallam County. Not to mention many have been jailed for serious felonies, which is highly concerning as a parent. If nothing else, this should be one major motivator to get a lot of “normie” busy parents out there to educate themselves enough to see what is happening all around them to want real change in our leadership this fall.
I have been in professional media for 50 years and promise you that not clearly identifying any potential conflicts of interest by authors of advertorials - which is what the two referenced articles are - is severely frowned upon. Not saying they don't convey some good news for the community, that is not the point. The newspaper can easily have a reporter interview the authors are write the same story while perhaps asking a question or two about any potential negatives, thus making it now a news story and not an opinion piece produced by an interested party. The real kick is allowed Commissioner Ozias to pen a weekly column, without offering someone with an opposing viewpoint the same regular opportunity.
"Most everyone knows"? Not everyone knows, and out of respect for everyone, identifying one's role in an organization should be commonplace.
"Not everyone knows" is true because of the fact that the SG is still in business pulling the wool over the eyes of their gullible readers.
Great story and great work. It is my opinion that both the Sequim Gazette & Peninsula Daily News are only good for fish wrappers, (even for that, they have even priced themselves out of that market). They have the same problem as all the Franchise and National Media Companies, they refuse to tell the truth. In my opinion they are paid off by political groups, special interest groups and politicians. When these groups or individuals start using these Media outlets to write their own stories on what they are doing instead of actually doing the interviewing, it tells exactly what the media is. It would be refreshing to actually have these papers do some serious reporting and start asking the tough questions so those in-charge have to answer them. I look at the Local, State and National Media as the Soviet Style PolutBuro. Someone has to run cover for the politicians in power and sell the NORMIES the lies that their politicians are doing the best they can for them. This platform as well as a few others typically share the truth. This definitely helps shed sunlight on issues and I believe it is having an affect. Thank you CCWD, Clallamity Jen, Strait Shooter, Clallam County Letters & Sequim Monitor.
John, add https://www.olympicherald.com/
He's newer, but seems to be wading into the judicial system. He's done 6 articles on Clallam County Judge Basden which raised my eyebrows ; )
I have subscribed to www.olympicherald.com/. Knew I missed something..DUH!
"The Washington Legislature is considering HB 2559, which would allow cities and counties (starting April 1, 2027) to impose a local excise tax up to 4% on short-term rentals to fund affordable housing." Can someone please define for me what "affordable housing" is? It's a term thrown around regularly, yet no one can seem to produce a measurable number that could define whether a program to support "affordable housing" is a success or failure. does it mean that a young single person working a minimum wage job should be able to afford a home? Or a retiree afford a townhouse? Or the mythical married couple with two kids and a dog afford a 3 bedroom, two bath home on a small lot in town? How do you define the term, and then measure any results you seek with more tax money??
It's like calling everyone who doesn't live in a house, "homeless."
People need to pay attention.
“Affordable housing” is housing where a household pays no more than 30 percent of its gross income on housing costs. For renters this includes rent plus utilities and for owners it includes mortgage, taxes, insurance, and basic fees. Those income limits are tied to something called Area Median Income (AMI). AMI is calculated each year by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for every county and household size is taken into consideration. For a single person household in Clallam County, an income of $48,000 would allow for a monthly housing cost of $1,200.
There’s essentially two types of “affordable housing.” The first one and the one used for writing policies is based on the AMI of the County. The second is your personal "affordable housing” which is based on your personal income. One person’s affordability is another's unobtainable. Working for minimum wage 40 hours a week every week earns a gross income of $35,630. A single person household earning the minimum wage with 40 hours a week could afford $990 a month. Anything above that is classed as housing burdened.
If someone is BUYING a home, Lenders typically look for a debt-to-income (DTI) ratio of 36% or less for a home loan, though ratios up to 43%-50% may be accepted depending on the loan type (e.g., FHA, VA) and applicant creditworthiness. DTI is calculated by dividing total monthly debt payments (including the new mortgage) by gross monthly income. So, it could be that 30% is not a definite number for buying property.
But the "Afordable Housing" that we are talking about in this case, is housing on land THAT IS OWNED BY THE COUNTY. Low income people have to qualify. This is not 'afordable housing' that low income people are buying. It is paid for by taxpayers and parsed out by the County, according to people who qualify. It is RENTING.
Drew, thank you for the information. So far the "affordable housing" being built isn't being done. You are the first to address this rather stretched out wording called "affordable housing" Keep it up, it really needs to be addressed. Find what is being built now under "affordable housing" It isn't happening. Thank you again!!!!
PS The figures don't include health insurance cost for people who just go over the limit for medicaid. Figure at least $800 to $2,000 (a month) for a single male who has to pay if they aren't covered under their jobs.
And the Legislature is considering a bill that would further tie the hands of local governments that want to clean up homeless encampments. I think they push some version of this in every legislative session, like Groundhog Day.
https://www.axios.com/local/seattle/2026/01/22/washington-state-homeless-encampment-sweep-law
https://app.leg.wa.gov/BillSummary/?BillNumber=2489&Year=2025&Initiative=false
SomeSome, You are right, the way it is presented, face value, it sounds fair, but what actually happens: The streets become lawless
Under the bill, SHELTER WOULD HAVE TO ALLOW PETS, PARTNERS, AND PERSONAL BELONGINGS. Programs that REQUIRE SOBRIETY, PARTICIPATION IN TREATMENT, OR COMPLIANCE WITH CERTAIN BEHAVIORAL RULES COULD BE DEEMED INADEQUATE, BARRING CITIES FROM RELYING ON THOSE OPTIONS TO JUSTIFY ENFORCEMENT !!!!!
• That would effectively mean police "cannot clear blocked sidewalks, address fire hazards under overpasses, or ensure public access to public spaces," Lowe said.
Links to definitions in code:
Revised Code of Washington (RCW) – Affordable Housing Definition
RCW 43.63A.510
https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=43.63A.510
Washington Growth Management Act (GMA)
RCW 36.70A.070(2) – Housing Element requirements
https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=36.70A.070
RCW 36.70A.030 – Definitions used in the GMA
https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=36.70A.030
Port Angeles Municipal Code (PAMC)
17.08.010 – Zoning Code (includes local housing and affordability provisions)
https://library.municode.com/wa/port_angeles/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT17ZO
I would like to clarify some information regarding the arrest of Roman Penn.
Yes he was arrested after leaving work. He was profiled, and arrested for DUI. Do you know why? Because the arresting state patrol officer seen an unopened Narcan in his vehicle. I carry Narcan and gloves in my purse because I never know what kind of situation I will run into and would rather help someone than leave them to die.
Upon his arrest, he requested a blood test. Blood testing takes a long time to process. His probation officer came down to the jail to violate him and gave him a UA, THAT CAME BACK CLEAN! AND HE WAS RELEASED!
Roman has been doing excellent since the interview with King 5
He has been working and trying!
I usually really love your articles, but was super bummed to see you insinuating about the un warranted arrest of Roman.
He's been doing great and deserves our support, not our scrutiny.
Thank you SC. I'm glad there are budding success stories out there, and you are helping.
Roman would be a good one for Jeff and Jake to interview
Roman isn't open to an interview.
Tell Roman there are many people who will stand behind his desire to work and try. It does take a village!
Thank you
Actually SC, I would like an interview with you. Over the years you have been extremely open, have knowledge of areas I don't and are so frank and unassuming it makes me believe in you. If you believe in Roman, so do I. You don't back a losing horse!
I'm flattered, thank you
I am not following how he was "profiled" for having Narcan in the vehicle while driving. If you are saying he was racially or otherwise profiled to be pulled over by LE, that's a serious accusation
that is good to hear, but are you saying he was pulled over without cause? MAT drugs can be intoxicating, even unintentionally.
I'm not sure on the initial pull over reason. I want to say it was speeding, but am not 100% on that.
When the officer came up to the window, he saw unopened Narcan and more than likely recognized Rome from his previous encounters in drug abuse.
He asked him to do a sobriety test, and Roman had just finished a construction job so I guess did not pass which resulted in his arrest. That and he requested a blood analysis because he knew he was clean.
I know a majority of construction workers in the our county because my husband has been working in that industry for the last 30 years. Not any of those men who work those hours bracing walls and standing on ladders all day will be able to walk a straight line after work.
He is a rare occurrence example of using the current system for what it is intended for.
Boy howdy this one is fully loaded. Makes SpudAbakers Baked N Loaded Spuds look like a snack.
Thank you Jeff!
Thank you for sharing the Strait Shooter article! What you say is what the Strait Shooter Staff cares most about — highlight the failure of governance, and there isn’t a shortage of inspiration in Clallam County!
When you feed Pigeons you get more Pigeons. With our political representatives wasting taxes and resources on unsolvable discrimination it is time to make the customers of law enforcement pay for their law enforcement. If a criminal cannot pay for the system costs to incarcerate and/or adjudicate their crimes, they can stay incarcerated. Less costly to keep them in jail than to pay all the law enforcement system costs repeatedly for the same criminal. Force criminals to live in jail or force criminals to live a life they do not want that harms society. You choose.
Great article today, Jeff. A lot of information to pass along. This WSAC is one to keep a really close eye on. And you, Jeff, have never taken your eye off of that organization. The messaging from WSAC resembles the DCD's. Clear as mud. Q&A forum today at the BoCC 10:00 Regular Meeting. See you there!
You're welcome, Denise.
God morning Jeff,
A lot to take in over my coffee. Great job! We have a problem that the commissioners refuse to acknowledge their Harm program tied with our lax state enforcement of laws lead to our current environment that they tell everyone how great they've made things for citizens of Clallam County. Fix by government on the fix....hmmm.
Please keep it up Jeff.
Thanks for more light in otherwise topics buried in the dark. Have a great day.
P.S. You mentioned Strait signs and I picked an extra one for a commenter that wanted a postcard sized one....I failed to get his name and looked back to the article and couldn't find him. Any chance of hooking him up. I'll take it anywhere for delivery. Thanks
Wow, that's great. Yep, I can do that.
I'm not sure what to make of the STR tax issue, if we limit the discussion to taxation. I'm a fan of use-tax vs flat-tax. STR taxes nationally range up to 15-18%. Those who are visiting Clallam County are getting a bargain, and tourism is a big part of our tax base. The clear rub? When an elected official is taking on a quasi-conflict of interest position while serving on in an official capacity of another organization then they have a responsibility to distinguish those roles, to their electorate. Especially given that they likely would not be part of the other organization if it was not for their electorate getting them their public position as well as our tax dollars paying for their membership in theis organization.
Another aspect to consider. Is the OPMA being skirted by all of the BOCCC being part of WASAC where they do have discussions on matters that affect the public?
Given Olympia has seen fit to put over 1,000 bills on the agenda for their 2026 session one has to do with forcing jurisdictions to offer and make available living space for the "homeless" otherwise arresting someone for "living on the streets" in violation of a possible ordinance cannot be enforced. Aside from the work around to the recent Grant's Pass ruling, it appears that PA won't have a problem complying with the empty beds noted at Serenity House.