Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeff Tozzer's avatar

The commissioners and Dr. Berry did not respond to questions regarding public officials correcting misleading or erroneous information provided to the public. Here is today's email sent to the five Shore Aquatic Center board members: Mike French, Randy Johnson, Mark Hodgson, LaTrisha Suggs, and Greg Shield.

Dear Shore Aquatic Center Board members,

The Board is consulting with the facility's liability insurance carrier regarding the shower voucher program.

Does that mean the Board believes there are potential liability risks associated with inviting homeless individuals—some of whom may be actively struggling with addiction or mental illness—to use a facility primarily designed for children and families?

If the Board has received months of public testimony expressing concerns about safety, drug activity, and the appropriateness of the program, why would the insurance carrier's opinion become the deciding factor? If there are no meaningful risks, why is the insurance carrier being consulted? Conversely, if the Board believes there are enough potential risks to seek guidance from its insurer, doesn't that suggest the community's concerns were worthy of greater consideration from the beginning?

Is the Board waiting for the insurance company to determine whether the program is appropriate, or will it make that policy decision based on the feedback it has already received from the public?

Thank you for your time. I appreciate any clarification you can provide.

Robert's avatar

Just an observation for those who don't want legacy forests harvested, as they have been so designated for decades; 1), Are you willing to personally make up the difference in lost tax revenue not harvesting the trees would provide? If not, are you willing to see the governmental services this revenue funds be reduced accordingly? And my favorite, 2), Do you use toilet paper? If so, what's your alternative?

As for the ongoing personal attacks on Jeff and Jake - which are shameful - they are but a symptom of a not-so-small fanatical group of so-called "progressives" in Clallam County whose minds are made up, and who believe that bigger government funded by somebody else's money is the answer to all of society's problems. Those of us who believe the opposite is true, and who believe in governmental accountability and transparency at every level, must remember that at election time this group will turn out to vote in big numbers. The result will hinge in no small measure on the turnout from the small government side. It's up to all of us to make sure that friends and family vote.

43 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?