The commissioners did not answer yesterday's question. Here is today's email:
Dear Commissioners,
Given that WSAC is a 501(c)(4) advocacy organization and not just a professional association, how do you ensure that its policy positions align with the interests of Clallam County residents — especially on issues like property tax growth caps or mileage fees — before committing taxpayer dues?
The response below is a modeled example of how an individual county commissioner could address concerns about WSAC membership by explaining the legal authority, administrative discretion, tradeoffs, and accountability expectations in plain language.
Dear Mr. Tozzer,
Thank you for continuing to raise this question. The concern you articulate—that it feels contradictory for the County to experience financial strain while continuing to pay dues to organizations such as the Washington State Association of Counties (WSAC)—is understandable and merits a clear, on-the-record explanation.
I am responding as an individual commissioner, not on behalf of the Clallam County Board of Commissioners.
1. Legal and administrative context: Under the Clallam County Charter and County Code, the Board of County Commissioners serves as the county’s legislative authority and is responsible for adopting the annual budget and authorizing discretionary expenditures not otherwise mandated by state law. The Charter and Code do not require membership in intergovernmental associations such as the Washington State Association of Counties, nor do they delegate county policy authority to such organizations. Accordingly, participation in WSAC is a discretionary governance decision that must be justified through the budget process and explained to the public as serving a legitimate county purpose (Clallam County Charter, n.d.; Clallam County Code, n.d.; Municipal Research and Services Center [MRSC], 2024a). WSAC is organized as a 501(c)(4) social welfare organization, which permits it to engage in legislative advocacy on issues affecting counties collectively (Internal Revenue Service [IRS], n.d.). That status does not grant WSAC authority over county policy, nor does it bind member counties to adopt WSAC’s positions.
2. Why counties choose to participate in WSAC: Counties often participate in WSAC because it can provide:
2.1. Legislative monitoring and early notice of state actions affecting county budgets and mandates
2.2. Coordinated advocacy on structural issues that individual counties—particularly small or rural ones—may struggle to influence alone
2.3. Policy research, best practices, and peer learning that reduce administrative risk
In this sense, WSAC is intended to function as a tool counties may use to advance locally identified priorities at the state level—not as a decision-maker or substitute for local governance.
3. The tradeoffs and risks residents are identifying: The discomfort many residents are expressing reflects real governance tensions:
3.1. Cost sensitivity: Even modest dues can feel inappropriate when local services are constrained.
3.2. Advocacy misalignment: WSAC represents counties as a class; statewide positions may not always align with Clallam County’s specific needs, especially on issues such as property tax growth limits or transportation-related fees.
3.3. Time and focus: Commissioners are paid by the county to represent residents. Time spent in statewide advocacy must supplement—not replace—local engagement and responsiveness.
These concerns do not imply wrongdoing; they highlight the need for clarity and explanation.
4. How advocacy is intended to flow in a healthy system: In a well-functioning governance system, advocacy should move upward from residents, not downward from institutions:
4.1. Residents identify needs, concerns, and priorities.
4.2. Commissioners deliberate publicly and determine what to advance.
4.3. Associations like WSAC are used, where appropriate, to amplify those locally defined priorities at the state level.
When this chain is unclear or reversed, public trust erodes.
5. Accountability expectations: Because WSAC membership is discretionary, good governance requires commissioners to be able to explain:
5.1. What specific public purpose does the membership serve for Clallam County
5.2. Where WSAC positions align with local priorities—and where they do not
5.3. How the benefits justify the cost, particularly during financial strain
5.4. What conditions would prompt reconsideration of continued membership
Public-sector best practices emphasize that expenditures should be clearly tied to the mission, authorized through proper processes, and explained to the public in plain language (Government Finance Officers Association [GFOA], 2020; MRSC, 2024b).
6. Good Governance Checklist for residents: Residents evaluating county memberships, advocacy, or similar expenditures may find it helpful to ask:
☐ Is the membership or conference clearly tied to the county’s statutory mission?
☐ Was it approved through the budget or board action?
☐ Does the county receive tangible value (e.g., research, training, compliance support)?
☐ Are advocacy positions treated as advisory, not binding on local policy?
☐ Can commissioners clearly explain the benefit to the public, especially during fiscal stress?
Using shared questions like these helps move civic discussion from frustration toward accountability and problem-solving.
Closing: The question you raise reflects a broader desire for assurance that county priorities are being driven by residents’ needs, not by institutional momentum or external advocacy alone. That assurance is built through transparency, clear explanations, and ongoing public engagement.
WSAC does what?it appears to me it is just another NGO to help build the liberal taxaholic party and control counties.This is how the top state official agendas get implicated state wide like drug addict issues,increase taxes-fees,immirant issues,controlled voting issues,tribal issues,ect ect ect.39 counties in wa state and all are involved with WSAC.Millions in coffers so do all the members get paid this sure would explain why counties are involved.
Since Mark Ozias has been elected president the Washington State Association of Counties, I imagine that he will be paid a salary from that organization. Shouldn't he be stepping down from his role in Clallam County?
His new role will definitely conflict with the performance in his role as County Commissioner, both in his being present to do the job and as you have mentioned, sometimes also conflicting goals. I don't see a justification for him remaining as County Commissioner.
The absence of a formal ethics policy in an organization that claims "professional" status creates a significant gap between its self-image and its operational reality. In modern business and institutional theory, professionalism isn't just about technical skill; it’s about accountability and standardization.
Here is what that absence typically suggests about the organization's true nature:
1. Ambiguity as a Liability
Professionalism is defined by a shared set of values that govern behavior. Without a written policy, "ethics" becomes subjective—left to the individual interpretation of employees or managers.
* The Message: The organization relies on "intuition" rather than "infrastructure."
* The Risk: This creates an environment where inconsistent decisions are made, leading to perceived favoritism or unfairness.
2. Lack of Institutional Maturity
Established professions (like law, medicine, or engineering) are defined by their codes of conduct. If an organization lacks one, it suggests they are in a "reactive" mode rather than a "proactive" one.
* Professionalism vs. Amateurism:
A professional entity anticipates ethical dilemmas (conflicts of interest, data privacy, harassment) and provides a framework for solving them. An amateur entity waits for a crisis to occur before deciding what their values are.
3. Weak Accountability Structures
A hallmark of a professional organization is the ability to hold members accountable to a standard higher than just "what is legal."
* The Gap: If there is no policy, there is no benchmark for discipline or reform. It suggests the organization may be prioritizing expediency over integrity, as it is much harder to whistleblow or report misconduct when no "rule" has been officially documented.
4. Reputation and Trust Deficits
External stakeholders (clients, investors, and partners) look for ethical frameworks as a form of "insurance."
* The Perception: The absence of a policy suggests that the organization may not take its social or fiduciary responsibilities seriously. It signals that the "professional" label is likely a marketing tactic rather than a cultural foundation
While an organization can perform high-quality work without a written ethics policy, it cannot be considered truly "professional" in the structural sense. Professionalism requires a commitment to public and internal standards that exist independently of the people currently in charge.
No Code of ethics is a realm for Mark to thrive. He's so used to operating with impunity to whatever he does. I can't wait to see a recall come up for him!
His recall will be at his next election cycle. Recalls are a massive and difficult undertaking due to the restrictions the RCW and court rulings place on the process.
Every day I crack open the Watchdog articles and what impresses me more than anything is growing engagement. New names pop up on a continual bases whether it is a comment, or a like to a comment.
The groundswell is forming, and it's not brought on by just a "handful" of malcontents. It's brought on by people whose eyes are seeing the reality Jeff shines a light on to what's going on in Clallam County. Something not possible through legacy local media.
I urge our local elected officials to keep making the choices they do, because it's their own doing that's going to cause them their own pain, like a Greek tragedy in the making.
Perfect government is not possible, that reality can't be missed, but I'm not interested in that. I want a government that attempts to balance the needs of every constituent it represents, and in that desire there's work to be done. Most importantly is to elect Jake Seegers.
As noted in a wonderful comment yesterday is that this engagement we're seeing needs to be more than comments, because more than comments is what has brought us this imbalance in equal representation in Clallam County.
IMO, Ozias is a liberal politician of the worst kind. He is clearly an unethical, self promoting ideologue. He does not represent the larger constituency but instead his focus is the Tribe and himself. He has no moral compass!
Why,.why, why does Clallam need to spent nearly $500,000 since 2015 to belong to this lobby group!? What has it done for the citizens of Clallam? We all know the answer to this question - Nothing!
Ozias should be investigated by the DOJ and prosecuted!
These incestuous socialist/communist "associations" (clubs) exist to grossly pervert the vote and free will of our American Constitutional rights. So, they have actually accomplished a great MANY things, none of them good~! When older folks comment about how life in Clallam County (or anywhere in America) has degraded over the past decades, this is EXACTLY how our quality of life has been intentionally and methodically destroyed! In the 1970's the popular term was "creeping socialism" and as you can see that subversive process was already well under way before that time... ALL Americans who want their freedom and rights must stand up against these unlawful unconstitutional acts now~!
I love your line: "why is it [WASC] at arm's length?" You said it all about WASC, Jeff. The more I hear about it, the more I think it is a group of elitists trying to look like it cares for the little people. They just rephrase words and pass along information as if it's new and making a difference. Once again, the facade of a financial burden is exposed. Thank you, Jeff!
Clallamity Jen's new post today is about Town Halls. An informative read for all!
Great article, Karen joined me after the meeting and said it was a wasted effort. I told her, thanks to my opened eyes via CCWD, it will show the lack of representation as you mentioned. I truly hope enough people will see what happens in our county and vote for true representation.
Jake Seegers is a fantastic start!
Next time I see Matt , one of the assistant prosecuting attorneys, I'll ask him if we have enough on Mark Nozias to get that ball rolling. Keep the torch burng Jeff. Thank you.
It was good to see Karen. She tells it like it is. The Commissioners need to know they aren't imperialistic kings who get paid to frivilously spend other people's money.
People of Clallam County need to realize, this elected official is part-time with this side gig called Commissioner of Clallam County. This is MarkO’s side job, lemonade-stand profits, mad money, chump change. Free money. He just has to beg for the funds, like all politicians. Someone will open their wallets. Money is the mother’s milk of politics. Politics is about his power. Power is his high.
Yep $118,000 a year plus benefits that is nice taxpayer chump change to have him sit in the Commissioners seat 20 hours a month. What a SCAM, what a CON! Deny deny deny and when guilty deny. Keep creating bigger and bigger urban guettos while feathering the $$$nest. Once they are in the guetto they never have a chance of making it out….round and round and round we go, oops another one fell into the guetto, oh no. How marvelous more money for Ozias just keep pretending more tax dollars are fixing it all.
So, for well over 100 years Clallam County has "voluntarily" spent a sizable amount of OUR taxpayer money to be in a non-essential subversive "club" (association?) of other Washington State Counties that regularly schemes and plots against the will and votes of the people who live here~? That sure does explain a lot~! Who is REALLY behind this sick "association" WASC and what is their REAL agenda~? Who do these criminally unconstitutional fools think that they are? Could this very voluntary "club" actually be at the root of the many problems that "we" (voting taxpayers and residents of Clallam County) are having SO much trouble with, that is directly responsible for the very financial mismanagement perversions that have led to so much of OUR money being wasted? Is THIS "club" where the "harm reduction" policies (subversions) are really coming from, that have directly created and fostered SO much homelessness, drug addiction, graffiti, trash, burglaries, robberies, auto & property thefts, assaults, murders, outrageous taxes & fees, policing and enforcement issues??? Is THIS where the utter garbage is coming from, that the county clown show in our county government "preaches" about how the local Jamestown Tribe should be helped to rob our community of a free market economy, independent small businesses, money, taxes, freedoms, rights, and properties??? Yes, Jeff Tozzer did another fine job of revealing the truth about the corruption that exists within our local community and state, that hides just under their thin layer of "feel good" lies and deceptive marketing schemes~! Regardless of the many phony excuses, we should absolutely forbid the Clallam County Commissioners to spend OUR money on any outside clubs or "associations" and furthermore we should absolutely forbid each Clallam County Commissioner to have a membership in or to attend ANY outside organization that promotes ANYTHING that goes against the will and vote of the good folks within our community~! Why on earth would "we" (Clallam County residents) want or even put up with any of our public servants who violate our public trust by attending any clubs or associations that blatantly regularly act against our free will, vote, and best interests~? These idiots from outside of our County and community have absolutely no authority, business, or right to interfere in OUR community's internal business matters~! I don't care if previous generations were foolish enough to be bamboozled into allowing this madness for even 200 years, because "we" need to put an end to these avenues of corruption that infect our community and work to undermine and destroy our local quality of life right now~! We never got to vote for this outrageous "influence peddling" crappola, nor should we tolerate it going forward~! We must immediately reject any of the controlling big government garbage that Ozias attempts to push on us, like a criminal drug dealer who pushes a deadly drug, or we will be led down a horrific path of destruction and misery. We must not allow these corruptions of our community to continue~! JUST SAY NO~!
Do they join up and seek answers from outside, even other sovereign nations, because of lack of ability to figure out or fix anything on their own? Is it a matter of simple incompetense for the job they are elected to.? It is a small population pool to choose from? Learning by doing a job with limited knowledge base , sort of learn as you go, and be influenced by outsiders or questionable others who have "agendas"?
Your questions here can lead to the very root of our problems, when the correct answers are realized. In fact, due to my parents being "need-to-know" professionals at high levels of government and big business, at a very early age I was "rudely" awakened to the reality that "we" (Americans & society) are constantly subjected to a tremendous number of lies and deceptions, that literally create a "fake world" (in fact a "trap" of enslavement) for all of us from cradle to grave. This is indeed a purposefully designed and orchestrated "trap" that is simple in its design, yet VERY complex to those who first consider it. "We" (Americans/humanity) are conditioned to assume that the Individuals in positions of power are simply clumsy, foolish, Ignorant, and incompetent, which certainly can be true in some cases. The absolutely glaring problem with that "mass blanket assumption" that is intentionally created to trick otherwise good folks to give up and stop looking deeper into the real causes of our problems in society, is simple mathematics. Specifically, "statistics"~! Each of us has to ask ourselves if it is really "statistically likely" that the vast majority of Individuals who gain positions of power and control over Americans and humanity all over the entire world, could possibly be on the same page in directing everyone into an increasingly oppressive big government dictatorship~? Yes, there are some few notable high-profile exceptions, who (for the majority of folks) believe in fighting against the vast majority of others who are, at one level or another, engaged in "putting the screws" to humanity. Like him or not, President Trump is such an example, who has clearly been constantly attacked by the vast majority of "highly questionable" Individuals in power positions. So, when the vast majority of Individuals in positions of power who we know can't be trusted, ALL in unison attack one Individual, even before he got into office the first time, engage in a wild inexplicable assault upon that one Individual... is it statistically likely that one specific Individual is part of the criminals of humanity and their evil agenda? This is THE question that, once better understood, reveals the absolute truth~! This is the very process that Americans and folks all over the world are engaged in. I am not particularly Intelligent myself, but this has been the very process that I have been fully engaged in for debatably over 60 years now, at one level of another. So, I know the answers to your great questions here, but everyone now needs to find them for themselves for the solution to be found and realized. Does anyone REALLY believe that the vast majority of Individuals in power positions in government and the business world automatically "magically" engage in the destruction of everyone's freedoms & rights? Even ALL of those in government management positions of power who Individually swore oaths to "protect our rights"~? Or is there something else going on~? Ha! As always, the answers are right in front of everyone's faces and has been all along, as have been the solutions~! Keep the faith!
Clallam County Commissioner Mike French stated yesterday he would attend a town hall if asked by an organization. I ask now what criteria do you require? Will you attend a town hall organized by an independent group of citizens? Would you attend a town hall set up by one citizen? Does a group of citizens need a certain “standing” in order for your attendance? I, a citizen of Clallam County, want to set up a town hall and am asking what the requirements are. Please inform me of these requirements as soon as possible. Are other commissioners or county officials agreeable to attend?
I'd ask that someone like Mark Curtis moderate it, and that even if people don't like a response that they keep it to themselves. It's difficult to hear in meetings when the grumbling interferes with the process. If anyone expects Mike to show up and answer questions the last thing needed is personal disrespect. The process can't work if that isn't controlled.
We must set the pace and think positive, do our own research and expect the best. If we are disappointed with results, at least we have tried. Let's hope we can succeed in getting a real town hall.
Another great article, Jeff. I have no objection to electric vehicles paying a per mile tax since the buggers weigh about 30% more than do gas powered vehicles, on average, due to the weight of their batteries. Not fair that they use the road but don't pay a tax--if taxes MUST be paid.
I am curious what the WSAC does. Maybe a meeting agenda ? I am confident that Government should not be in the social engineering business. Examples being MWBE, DEI, LGBTQ+, "native" American, other nationality and harm reduction should also be included. Any and all resources used for this Government minority-ism should be captured and spent on safety / law enforcement.
If you look into it, you will find that the WASC is exactly where the local county clown show gets its socialist/communist "marching orders" that have led to ALL of the serious problems that "we" regularly discuss here on The Watchdog~! ALL of our problems that cause us great distress and concern, come directly from the WASC because that sick and disgusting organization (private club) exists to operate as a mechanism of destruction and attack upon our very quality of life. You watch, because it won't be too long after Ozias returns from Washington DC when he will double down on ALL of the sick policies and agenda that he has been pushing all along! Ozias was not elected to head the WASC by chance, so he MUST make Clallam County the state example of their evil agenda... Soon Ozias will be doubling down on Unconstitutionally monitoring our vehicle driving miles to increase our taxes, more & more destructive "harm reduction" failures, new taxes and fees, economy choking rules, regulations, taxes, and fees, more of our rights and public properties given away to the local Jamestown Tribal government thieves, etc... That is exactly why the WASC exists... Keep an eye on these dangerous criminals within our government, because with just one of their unconstitutional decisions, they can destroy hundreds of lives here and even get more folks killed. No public criminal can even come close to the damage that this handful of criminals within out government can and regularly do! Guess where the corruption of our election system in Washington State likely comes from???
In Washington State, the distinction between "essential" and "wants" for elected officials isn't found in a single dictionary definition. Instead, it is governed by three specific legal frameworks: Constitutional prohibitions, Statutory mandates, and Local budget priorities.
If you are looking for the "line in the sand" that prevents officials from spending money on whatever they want, here are the three levels that apply:
1. The Constitutional Line: "Fundamental Purposes"
The Washington State Constitution (Article VIII, Section 7) prohibits the "Gift of Public Funds." To avoid an illegal "gift," an expenditure must meet one of two tests:
* The Fundamental Purpose Test: Does the spending carry out a core government function (e.g., public safety, education, or infrastructure)? If it does, it is considered "essential" by default.
* The Consideration Test: If the spending isn't a "fundamental purpose," the government must receive something of equal value in return (e.g., buying a service at market rate).
* The "Poor and Infirm" Exception: The Constitution explicitly allows spending on the "necessary support of the poor and infirm" even if it might otherwise look like a gift. This is the legal floor for social services.
2. The Statutory Line: "Mandatory" vs. "Discretionary"
When state and local officials build a budget, they distinguish between what they must do by law and what they choose to do:
* Mandatory (The "Essentials"): These are services the state or city is legally required to provide. For example, Washington’s Constitution (Article IX) makes the "ample provision" for the education of all children the state's "paramount duty." Other mandates include pensions, debt service, and basic public safety (police/fire).
* Discretionary (The "Wants"): This includes programs that are legal to fund but not required by law. Examples often include parks and recreation, community grants, arts funding, or economic development incentives. In a budget crisis, these are usually the first to be cut.
3. The Local Policy Line: "Basic Services"
Most cities and counties in Washington (under guidance from the Municipal Research and Services Center (MRSC)) define their "essential" services during their annual budget process. While specific definitions vary by city, they generally fall into this hierarchy:
| Priority Level | Category | Typical Services |
High (Essential) | Public Health & Safety | Police, Fire/EMS, Jail, Courts, Public Health.
Medium (Core) | Infrastructure | Road maintenance, Water/Sewer, Solid Waste.
Low (Discretionary) | Quality of Life | Libraries, Community Centers, Special Events, Beautification.
If an elected official is spending money on something you consider a "want," the legal question isn't whether it's "essential," but rather:
* Is it legal? (Does it serve a public purpose and avoid being a "gift"?)
* Is it mandated? (Is there a law—an RCW—requiring them to do it?)
* Is it a policy choice? (If it’s not mandated, they are choosing to spend your tax dollars there instead of elsewhere.)
A lot of information there; thank you. It appears "Poor and Infirm" is where my thorn lives. Regarding Government services, I'm a "Basic Services" person. Discrimination is ubiquitous and can never not exist. Any Government resources invested in discrimination is wasted.
Anyone else in PA looking at the newly selected mayors in PT and Sequim and feeling concerned for PA? Association Washington Cities seems like just same as WSAC except city level. The new mayors have AWC "advance leadership certificate" which looks like requirements are maybe 30 hours(?) of specific continuing ed. I imagine other council members also continue their education in ways that don't involve jumping through specific lobbying hoops
The communists have been infiltrating these organizations for DECADES and they have effective control over most of the country...there is no peaceful way out of this...we live or die by our values...my price is my life!🥸
Good question, Herb. There are other, more pressing priorities that need to be addressed first.
I would also like a clearer understanding of what Clallam County citizens actually gain in return for the cost of WSAC membership. For example, do we save significantly more on insurance costs than we pay in membership dues as a result of bundled policies?
From my perspective, WSAC primarily lobbies on behalf of counties as institutions, not necessarily on behalf of citizens. If the interests advanced by WSAC do not align with the interests of Clallam County residents, then it would be reasonable to reconsider—or withdraw from—that membership. At the very least, initiatives that seek to increase commissioner authority to tax citizens without a vote should be opposed.
Maybe as the basis for discussion we look at what WSAC states. Also, just because an organization has been stood up doesn't mean that it's the only way to address the issues they claim to be concerned with, especially given the amount of money it costs to belong. May organizations such as this come to be because every believes that their existence is the only way to address matters.
We need lobbying groups that represent the people, not some of the people...maybe we have disintegrated to a communist/socialist/welfare state en masse!😎
It's way past time to outlaw NGOs and 501Cs. Most are being abused. Make them ALL pay taxes, which might lift some of the burden on middle class taxpayers. Seriously, there is no reason why ALL shouldn't pay their fair share of taxes, especially the Tribes. Shut down the BIA too.
The commissioners did not answer yesterday's question. Here is today's email:
Dear Commissioners,
Given that WSAC is a 501(c)(4) advocacy organization and not just a professional association, how do you ensure that its policy positions align with the interests of Clallam County residents — especially on issues like property tax growth caps or mileage fees — before committing taxpayer dues?
All three commissioners can be reached by emailing the Clerk of the Board at loni.gores@clallamcountywa.gov.
The response below is a modeled example of how an individual county commissioner could address concerns about WSAC membership by explaining the legal authority, administrative discretion, tradeoffs, and accountability expectations in plain language.
Dear Mr. Tozzer,
Thank you for continuing to raise this question. The concern you articulate—that it feels contradictory for the County to experience financial strain while continuing to pay dues to organizations such as the Washington State Association of Counties (WSAC)—is understandable and merits a clear, on-the-record explanation.
I am responding as an individual commissioner, not on behalf of the Clallam County Board of Commissioners.
1. Legal and administrative context: Under the Clallam County Charter and County Code, the Board of County Commissioners serves as the county’s legislative authority and is responsible for adopting the annual budget and authorizing discretionary expenditures not otherwise mandated by state law. The Charter and Code do not require membership in intergovernmental associations such as the Washington State Association of Counties, nor do they delegate county policy authority to such organizations. Accordingly, participation in WSAC is a discretionary governance decision that must be justified through the budget process and explained to the public as serving a legitimate county purpose (Clallam County Charter, n.d.; Clallam County Code, n.d.; Municipal Research and Services Center [MRSC], 2024a). WSAC is organized as a 501(c)(4) social welfare organization, which permits it to engage in legislative advocacy on issues affecting counties collectively (Internal Revenue Service [IRS], n.d.). That status does not grant WSAC authority over county policy, nor does it bind member counties to adopt WSAC’s positions.
2. Why counties choose to participate in WSAC: Counties often participate in WSAC because it can provide:
2.1. Legislative monitoring and early notice of state actions affecting county budgets and mandates
2.2. Coordinated advocacy on structural issues that individual counties—particularly small or rural ones—may struggle to influence alone
2.3. Policy research, best practices, and peer learning that reduce administrative risk
In this sense, WSAC is intended to function as a tool counties may use to advance locally identified priorities at the state level—not as a decision-maker or substitute for local governance.
3. The tradeoffs and risks residents are identifying: The discomfort many residents are expressing reflects real governance tensions:
3.1. Cost sensitivity: Even modest dues can feel inappropriate when local services are constrained.
3.2. Advocacy misalignment: WSAC represents counties as a class; statewide positions may not always align with Clallam County’s specific needs, especially on issues such as property tax growth limits or transportation-related fees.
3.3. Time and focus: Commissioners are paid by the county to represent residents. Time spent in statewide advocacy must supplement—not replace—local engagement and responsiveness.
These concerns do not imply wrongdoing; they highlight the need for clarity and explanation.
4. How advocacy is intended to flow in a healthy system: In a well-functioning governance system, advocacy should move upward from residents, not downward from institutions:
4.1. Residents identify needs, concerns, and priorities.
4.2. Commissioners deliberate publicly and determine what to advance.
4.3. Associations like WSAC are used, where appropriate, to amplify those locally defined priorities at the state level.
When this chain is unclear or reversed, public trust erodes.
5. Accountability expectations: Because WSAC membership is discretionary, good governance requires commissioners to be able to explain:
5.1. What specific public purpose does the membership serve for Clallam County
5.2. Where WSAC positions align with local priorities—and where they do not
5.3. How the benefits justify the cost, particularly during financial strain
5.4. What conditions would prompt reconsideration of continued membership
Public-sector best practices emphasize that expenditures should be clearly tied to the mission, authorized through proper processes, and explained to the public in plain language (Government Finance Officers Association [GFOA], 2020; MRSC, 2024b).
6. Good Governance Checklist for residents: Residents evaluating county memberships, advocacy, or similar expenditures may find it helpful to ask:
☐ Is the membership or conference clearly tied to the county’s statutory mission?
☐ Was it approved through the budget or board action?
☐ Does the county receive tangible value (e.g., research, training, compliance support)?
☐ Are advocacy positions treated as advisory, not binding on local policy?
☐ Can commissioners clearly explain the benefit to the public, especially during fiscal stress?
Using shared questions like these helps move civic discussion from frustration toward accountability and problem-solving.
Closing: The question you raise reflects a broader desire for assurance that county priorities are being driven by residents’ needs, not by institutional momentum or external advocacy alone. That assurance is built through transparency, clear explanations, and ongoing public engagement.
Thank you for pressing for clarity.
Sincerely,
Commissioner [Name]
Clallam County
References
Clallam County. (n.d.). Clallam County Charter. https://www.clallamcountywa.gov/
Clallam County. (n.d.). Clallam County Code. https://clallam.county.codes/
Government Finance Officers Association. (2020). Best practices in public budgeting. https://www.gfoa.org
Internal Revenue Service. (n.d.). Social welfare organizations. https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/other-non-profits/types-of-organizations-exempt-under-section-501c4
Municipal Research and Services Center. (2024a). County commissioners: Roles and responsibilities. https://mrsc.org/explore-topics/officials/roles/county-commissioners
Municipal Research and Services Center. (2024b, July). Legal v. ethical: Understanding the difference in public service. https://mrsc.org/stay-informed/mrsc-insight/july-2024/legal-v-ethical
Washington State Association of Counties. (2024). About WSAC. https://wsac.org
WSAC does what?it appears to me it is just another NGO to help build the liberal taxaholic party and control counties.This is how the top state official agendas get implicated state wide like drug addict issues,increase taxes-fees,immirant issues,controlled voting issues,tribal issues,ect ect ect.39 counties in wa state and all are involved with WSAC.Millions in coffers so do all the members get paid this sure would explain why counties are involved.
Since Mark Ozias has been elected president the Washington State Association of Counties, I imagine that he will be paid a salary from that organization. Shouldn't he be stepping down from his role in Clallam County?
His new role will definitely conflict with the performance in his role as County Commissioner, both in his being present to do the job and as you have mentioned, sometimes also conflicting goals. I don't see a justification for him remaining as County Commissioner.
Sure sounds like a conflict of interest to me.
The absence of a formal ethics policy in an organization that claims "professional" status creates a significant gap between its self-image and its operational reality. In modern business and institutional theory, professionalism isn't just about technical skill; it’s about accountability and standardization.
Here is what that absence typically suggests about the organization's true nature:
1. Ambiguity as a Liability
Professionalism is defined by a shared set of values that govern behavior. Without a written policy, "ethics" becomes subjective—left to the individual interpretation of employees or managers.
* The Message: The organization relies on "intuition" rather than "infrastructure."
* The Risk: This creates an environment where inconsistent decisions are made, leading to perceived favoritism or unfairness.
2. Lack of Institutional Maturity
Established professions (like law, medicine, or engineering) are defined by their codes of conduct. If an organization lacks one, it suggests they are in a "reactive" mode rather than a "proactive" one.
* Professionalism vs. Amateurism:
A professional entity anticipates ethical dilemmas (conflicts of interest, data privacy, harassment) and provides a framework for solving them. An amateur entity waits for a crisis to occur before deciding what their values are.
3. Weak Accountability Structures
A hallmark of a professional organization is the ability to hold members accountable to a standard higher than just "what is legal."
* The Gap: If there is no policy, there is no benchmark for discipline or reform. It suggests the organization may be prioritizing expediency over integrity, as it is much harder to whistleblow or report misconduct when no "rule" has been officially documented.
4. Reputation and Trust Deficits
External stakeholders (clients, investors, and partners) look for ethical frameworks as a form of "insurance."
* The Perception: The absence of a policy suggests that the organization may not take its social or fiduciary responsibilities seriously. It signals that the "professional" label is likely a marketing tactic rather than a cultural foundation
While an organization can perform high-quality work without a written ethics policy, it cannot be considered truly "professional" in the structural sense. Professionalism requires a commitment to public and internal standards that exist independently of the people currently in charge.
No Code of ethics is a realm for Mark to thrive. He's so used to operating with impunity to whatever he does. I can't wait to see a recall come up for him!
His recall will be at his next election cycle. Recalls are a massive and difficult undertaking due to the restrictions the RCW and court rulings place on the process.
So much corruption, so little time...he will have bankrupted the county by the time his term is up!👿
That's my biggest concern too!
Coming from Colorado he has no deep feelings for our state as I do. He's been on a mission of destruction since he hooked up with Ron Allen.
No Ethics, No Accountability, No hope!👿
Jim, perhaps he should also drop the many NGO boards he is on with conflicting goals.
Perhaps is too kind!👿
I was thinking the same thing, Jim.
Does he ever sleep? He needs to get some, unplug a bit . But those organizations pay him.
Demon-power! The Portrait of Dorian Grey!👿
Great Comment Patriot Jim king~!
Sincerely, Mike
That's why they call it grift/graft!👿
Every day I crack open the Watchdog articles and what impresses me more than anything is growing engagement. New names pop up on a continual bases whether it is a comment, or a like to a comment.
The groundswell is forming, and it's not brought on by just a "handful" of malcontents. It's brought on by people whose eyes are seeing the reality Jeff shines a light on to what's going on in Clallam County. Something not possible through legacy local media.
I urge our local elected officials to keep making the choices they do, because it's their own doing that's going to cause them their own pain, like a Greek tragedy in the making.
Perfect government is not possible, that reality can't be missed, but I'm not interested in that. I want a government that attempts to balance the needs of every constituent it represents, and in that desire there's work to be done. Most importantly is to elect Jake Seegers.
As noted in a wonderful comment yesterday is that this engagement we're seeing needs to be more than comments, because more than comments is what has brought us this imbalance in equal representation in Clallam County.
Onward, heav-ho!
A whole big basket overflowing with malcontents is just enough to get things going.
We are MAL-content because the CONTENT of the governing bodies is MAL!
They have to go...sooner than later...and he/they/it will be undermining us the whole way to the next 'selection' cycle! If we wait...we're done!🥸
Great article @Jeff Tozzer!
IMO, Ozias is a liberal politician of the worst kind. He is clearly an unethical, self promoting ideologue. He does not represent the larger constituency but instead his focus is the Tribe and himself. He has no moral compass!
Why,.why, why does Clallam need to spent nearly $500,000 since 2015 to belong to this lobby group!? What has it done for the citizens of Clallam? We all know the answer to this question - Nothing!
Ozias should be investigated by the DOJ and prosecuted!
Great comment Patriot Phillip Bates~!
These incestuous socialist/communist "associations" (clubs) exist to grossly pervert the vote and free will of our American Constitutional rights. So, they have actually accomplished a great MANY things, none of them good~! When older folks comment about how life in Clallam County (or anywhere in America) has degraded over the past decades, this is EXACTLY how our quality of life has been intentionally and methodically destroyed! In the 1970's the popular term was "creeping socialism" and as you can see that subversive process was already well under way before that time... ALL Americans who want their freedom and rights must stand up against these unlawful unconstitutional acts now~!
Sincerely, Mike
100%
🙏🏼😊
I love your line: "why is it [WASC] at arm's length?" You said it all about WASC, Jeff. The more I hear about it, the more I think it is a group of elitists trying to look like it cares for the little people. They just rephrase words and pass along information as if it's new and making a difference. Once again, the facade of a financial burden is exposed. Thank you, Jeff!
Clallamity Jen's new post today is about Town Halls. An informative read for all!
It's common knowledge that these "professional" organizations are a breeding ground for self-actualization. Maslow would be proud.
Sounds like this county , along with the state of Washington, is in need of a thorough audit for fraud.
Good morning Jeff,
Great article, Karen joined me after the meeting and said it was a wasted effort. I told her, thanks to my opened eyes via CCWD, it will show the lack of representation as you mentioned. I truly hope enough people will see what happens in our county and vote for true representation.
Jake Seegers is a fantastic start!
Next time I see Matt , one of the assistant prosecuting attorneys, I'll ask him if we have enough on Mark Nozias to get that ball rolling. Keep the torch burng Jeff. Thank you.
It was good to see Karen. She tells it like it is. The Commissioners need to know they aren't imperialistic kings who get paid to frivilously spend other people's money.
Burn, baby, BURN!🔥🤣
People of Clallam County need to realize, this elected official is part-time with this side gig called Commissioner of Clallam County. This is MarkO’s side job, lemonade-stand profits, mad money, chump change. Free money. He just has to beg for the funds, like all politicians. Someone will open their wallets. Money is the mother’s milk of politics. Politics is about his power. Power is his high.
Yep $118,000 a year plus benefits that is nice taxpayer chump change to have him sit in the Commissioners seat 20 hours a month. What a SCAM, what a CON! Deny deny deny and when guilty deny. Keep creating bigger and bigger urban guettos while feathering the $$$nest. Once they are in the guetto they never have a chance of making it out….round and round and round we go, oops another one fell into the guetto, oh no. How marvelous more money for Ozias just keep pretending more tax dollars are fixing it all.
Yep!👍🏼
Oh my gosh Jeff, I would love to use your letter re: tribal gas tax as a jumping off point for my own letter.
Great article today! Thank you!
Have at it, Eve. The more voices, the better!
We are all free to edit and paraphrase if we give acknowledgement of the original text. 😊
So, for well over 100 years Clallam County has "voluntarily" spent a sizable amount of OUR taxpayer money to be in a non-essential subversive "club" (association?) of other Washington State Counties that regularly schemes and plots against the will and votes of the people who live here~? That sure does explain a lot~! Who is REALLY behind this sick "association" WASC and what is their REAL agenda~? Who do these criminally unconstitutional fools think that they are? Could this very voluntary "club" actually be at the root of the many problems that "we" (voting taxpayers and residents of Clallam County) are having SO much trouble with, that is directly responsible for the very financial mismanagement perversions that have led to so much of OUR money being wasted? Is THIS "club" where the "harm reduction" policies (subversions) are really coming from, that have directly created and fostered SO much homelessness, drug addiction, graffiti, trash, burglaries, robberies, auto & property thefts, assaults, murders, outrageous taxes & fees, policing and enforcement issues??? Is THIS where the utter garbage is coming from, that the county clown show in our county government "preaches" about how the local Jamestown Tribe should be helped to rob our community of a free market economy, independent small businesses, money, taxes, freedoms, rights, and properties??? Yes, Jeff Tozzer did another fine job of revealing the truth about the corruption that exists within our local community and state, that hides just under their thin layer of "feel good" lies and deceptive marketing schemes~! Regardless of the many phony excuses, we should absolutely forbid the Clallam County Commissioners to spend OUR money on any outside clubs or "associations" and furthermore we should absolutely forbid each Clallam County Commissioner to have a membership in or to attend ANY outside organization that promotes ANYTHING that goes against the will and vote of the good folks within our community~! Why on earth would "we" (Clallam County residents) want or even put up with any of our public servants who violate our public trust by attending any clubs or associations that blatantly regularly act against our free will, vote, and best interests~? These idiots from outside of our County and community have absolutely no authority, business, or right to interfere in OUR community's internal business matters~! I don't care if previous generations were foolish enough to be bamboozled into allowing this madness for even 200 years, because "we" need to put an end to these avenues of corruption that infect our community and work to undermine and destroy our local quality of life right now~! We never got to vote for this outrageous "influence peddling" crappola, nor should we tolerate it going forward~! We must immediately reject any of the controlling big government garbage that Ozias attempts to push on us, like a criminal drug dealer who pushes a deadly drug, or we will be led down a horrific path of destruction and misery. We must not allow these corruptions of our community to continue~! JUST SAY NO~!
Sincerely, Mike
Do they join up and seek answers from outside, even other sovereign nations, because of lack of ability to figure out or fix anything on their own? Is it a matter of simple incompetense for the job they are elected to.? It is a small population pool to choose from? Learning by doing a job with limited knowledge base , sort of learn as you go, and be influenced by outsiders or questionable others who have "agendas"?
Excellent questions Patriot Jean Pratschner~!
Your questions here can lead to the very root of our problems, when the correct answers are realized. In fact, due to my parents being "need-to-know" professionals at high levels of government and big business, at a very early age I was "rudely" awakened to the reality that "we" (Americans & society) are constantly subjected to a tremendous number of lies and deceptions, that literally create a "fake world" (in fact a "trap" of enslavement) for all of us from cradle to grave. This is indeed a purposefully designed and orchestrated "trap" that is simple in its design, yet VERY complex to those who first consider it. "We" (Americans/humanity) are conditioned to assume that the Individuals in positions of power are simply clumsy, foolish, Ignorant, and incompetent, which certainly can be true in some cases. The absolutely glaring problem with that "mass blanket assumption" that is intentionally created to trick otherwise good folks to give up and stop looking deeper into the real causes of our problems in society, is simple mathematics. Specifically, "statistics"~! Each of us has to ask ourselves if it is really "statistically likely" that the vast majority of Individuals who gain positions of power and control over Americans and humanity all over the entire world, could possibly be on the same page in directing everyone into an increasingly oppressive big government dictatorship~? Yes, there are some few notable high-profile exceptions, who (for the majority of folks) believe in fighting against the vast majority of others who are, at one level or another, engaged in "putting the screws" to humanity. Like him or not, President Trump is such an example, who has clearly been constantly attacked by the vast majority of "highly questionable" Individuals in power positions. So, when the vast majority of Individuals in positions of power who we know can't be trusted, ALL in unison attack one Individual, even before he got into office the first time, engage in a wild inexplicable assault upon that one Individual... is it statistically likely that one specific Individual is part of the criminals of humanity and their evil agenda? This is THE question that, once better understood, reveals the absolute truth~! This is the very process that Americans and folks all over the world are engaged in. I am not particularly Intelligent myself, but this has been the very process that I have been fully engaged in for debatably over 60 years now, at one level of another. So, I know the answers to your great questions here, but everyone now needs to find them for themselves for the solution to be found and realized. Does anyone REALLY believe that the vast majority of Individuals in power positions in government and the business world automatically "magically" engage in the destruction of everyone's freedoms & rights? Even ALL of those in government management positions of power who Individually swore oaths to "protect our rights"~? Or is there something else going on~? Ha! As always, the answers are right in front of everyone's faces and has been all along, as have been the solutions~! Keep the faith!
Sincerely, Mike
Sent today
TOWN HALL INQUIERY
Clallam County Commissioner Mike French stated yesterday he would attend a town hall if asked by an organization. I ask now what criteria do you require? Will you attend a town hall organized by an independent group of citizens? Would you attend a town hall set up by one citizen? Does a group of citizens need a certain “standing” in order for your attendance? I, a citizen of Clallam County, want to set up a town hall and am asking what the requirements are. Please inform me of these requirements as soon as possible. Are other commissioners or county officials agreeable to attend?
Thank you
Eric Fehrmann
efehrm_3@hotmail.com
I am willing to rent the Dungeness school house if we get a good response from Mike French.
I'd ask that someone like Mark Curtis moderate it, and that even if people don't like a response that they keep it to themselves. It's difficult to hear in meetings when the grumbling interferes with the process. If anyone expects Mike to show up and answer questions the last thing needed is personal disrespect. The process can't work if that isn't controlled.
I agree with all your thoughts. If we can make this happen we need to set the standard. I will post here on progress.
If he shows, watch him do the socialist shuffle...there is no truth in him/them!🤓
We must set the pace and think positive, do our own research and expect the best. If we are disappointed with results, at least we have tried. Let's hope we can succeed in getting a real town hall.
Another great article, Jeff. I have no objection to electric vehicles paying a per mile tax since the buggers weigh about 30% more than do gas powered vehicles, on average, due to the weight of their batteries. Not fair that they use the road but don't pay a tax--if taxes MUST be paid.
I am curious what the WSAC does. Maybe a meeting agenda ? I am confident that Government should not be in the social engineering business. Examples being MWBE, DEI, LGBTQ+, "native" American, other nationality and harm reduction should also be included. Any and all resources used for this Government minority-ism should be captured and spent on safety / law enforcement.
Great comment patriot Gary Blankenship~!
If you look into it, you will find that the WASC is exactly where the local county clown show gets its socialist/communist "marching orders" that have led to ALL of the serious problems that "we" regularly discuss here on The Watchdog~! ALL of our problems that cause us great distress and concern, come directly from the WASC because that sick and disgusting organization (private club) exists to operate as a mechanism of destruction and attack upon our very quality of life. You watch, because it won't be too long after Ozias returns from Washington DC when he will double down on ALL of the sick policies and agenda that he has been pushing all along! Ozias was not elected to head the WASC by chance, so he MUST make Clallam County the state example of their evil agenda... Soon Ozias will be doubling down on Unconstitutionally monitoring our vehicle driving miles to increase our taxes, more & more destructive "harm reduction" failures, new taxes and fees, economy choking rules, regulations, taxes, and fees, more of our rights and public properties given away to the local Jamestown Tribal government thieves, etc... That is exactly why the WASC exists... Keep an eye on these dangerous criminals within our government, because with just one of their unconstitutional decisions, they can destroy hundreds of lives here and even get more folks killed. No public criminal can even come close to the damage that this handful of criminals within out government can and regularly do! Guess where the corruption of our election system in Washington State likely comes from???
Sincerely, Mike
In Washington State, the distinction between "essential" and "wants" for elected officials isn't found in a single dictionary definition. Instead, it is governed by three specific legal frameworks: Constitutional prohibitions, Statutory mandates, and Local budget priorities.
If you are looking for the "line in the sand" that prevents officials from spending money on whatever they want, here are the three levels that apply:
1. The Constitutional Line: "Fundamental Purposes"
The Washington State Constitution (Article VIII, Section 7) prohibits the "Gift of Public Funds." To avoid an illegal "gift," an expenditure must meet one of two tests:
* The Fundamental Purpose Test: Does the spending carry out a core government function (e.g., public safety, education, or infrastructure)? If it does, it is considered "essential" by default.
* The Consideration Test: If the spending isn't a "fundamental purpose," the government must receive something of equal value in return (e.g., buying a service at market rate).
* The "Poor and Infirm" Exception: The Constitution explicitly allows spending on the "necessary support of the poor and infirm" even if it might otherwise look like a gift. This is the legal floor for social services.
2. The Statutory Line: "Mandatory" vs. "Discretionary"
When state and local officials build a budget, they distinguish between what they must do by law and what they choose to do:
* Mandatory (The "Essentials"): These are services the state or city is legally required to provide. For example, Washington’s Constitution (Article IX) makes the "ample provision" for the education of all children the state's "paramount duty." Other mandates include pensions, debt service, and basic public safety (police/fire).
* Discretionary (The "Wants"): This includes programs that are legal to fund but not required by law. Examples often include parks and recreation, community grants, arts funding, or economic development incentives. In a budget crisis, these are usually the first to be cut.
3. The Local Policy Line: "Basic Services"
Most cities and counties in Washington (under guidance from the Municipal Research and Services Center (MRSC)) define their "essential" services during their annual budget process. While specific definitions vary by city, they generally fall into this hierarchy:
| Priority Level | Category | Typical Services |
High (Essential) | Public Health & Safety | Police, Fire/EMS, Jail, Courts, Public Health.
Medium (Core) | Infrastructure | Road maintenance, Water/Sewer, Solid Waste.
Low (Discretionary) | Quality of Life | Libraries, Community Centers, Special Events, Beautification.
If an elected official is spending money on something you consider a "want," the legal question isn't whether it's "essential," but rather:
* Is it legal? (Does it serve a public purpose and avoid being a "gift"?)
* Is it mandated? (Is there a law—an RCW—requiring them to do it?)
* Is it a policy choice? (If it’s not mandated, they are choosing to spend your tax dollars there instead of elsewhere.)
A lot of information there; thank you. It appears "Poor and Infirm" is where my thorn lives. Regarding Government services, I'm a "Basic Services" person. Discrimination is ubiquitous and can never not exist. Any Government resources invested in discrimination is wasted.
Anyone else in PA looking at the newly selected mayors in PT and Sequim and feeling concerned for PA? Association Washington Cities seems like just same as WSAC except city level. The new mayors have AWC "advance leadership certificate" which looks like requirements are maybe 30 hours(?) of specific continuing ed. I imagine other council members also continue their education in ways that don't involve jumping through specific lobbying hoops
The communists have been infiltrating these organizations for DECADES and they have effective control over most of the country...there is no peaceful way out of this...we live or die by our values...my price is my life!🥸
A question for Jake Seegers: If elected to the BOCC, will you seek to withdraw Clallam County from the Washington State Association of Counties?
Good question, Herb. There are other, more pressing priorities that need to be addressed first.
I would also like a clearer understanding of what Clallam County citizens actually gain in return for the cost of WSAC membership. For example, do we save significantly more on insurance costs than we pay in membership dues as a result of bundled policies?
From my perspective, WSAC primarily lobbies on behalf of counties as institutions, not necessarily on behalf of citizens. If the interests advanced by WSAC do not align with the interests of Clallam County residents, then it would be reasonable to reconsider—or withdraw from—that membership. At the very least, initiatives that seek to increase commissioner authority to tax citizens without a vote should be opposed.
Maybe as the basis for discussion we look at what WSAC states. Also, just because an organization has been stood up doesn't mean that it's the only way to address the issues they claim to be concerned with, especially given the amount of money it costs to belong. May organizations such as this come to be because every believes that their existence is the only way to address matters.
https://wsac.org/advocacy/
We need lobbying groups that represent the people, not some of the people...maybe we have disintegrated to a communist/socialist/welfare state en masse!😎
It's way past time to outlaw NGOs and 501Cs. Most are being abused. Make them ALL pay taxes, which might lift some of the burden on middle class taxpayers. Seriously, there is no reason why ALL shouldn't pay their fair share of taxes, especially the Tribes. Shut down the BIA too.