@JeffTozzer, for the record and to answer your question about "the Olympic Community of Health":
The Olympic Community of Health (OCH) is a regional nonprofit (501(c)(3)) serving Clallam, Jefferson, and Kitsap counties, created under Washington State’s Medicaid Transformation / Accountable Community of Health (ACH) model. OCH is not an elected body; it functions as a coordinating and funding hub for health- and social-service initiatives across the region, supported largely by state and federal Medicaid-related funding, grants, and service contracts.
On January 26, OCH hosted or sponsored “The Power of HOPE” at Peninsula College, featuring Chan Hellman, a researcher known for developing the Science of Hope framework. The 2.5-hour session focused on applying hope-based concepts to resilience, well-being, and community practice, including a discussion of “Hope Navigator” training.
If you haven't noticed my increased involvement in the comment sections, I might have to set some boundaries and practice what I preach with prohealth "sustainable" behavior and cut myself off from my "RABID" CC Watchdogging. I can't help myself from getting sucked down the rabbit hole trying to set the records(ssssss) straight in this county; it's never-ending, but thank goodness we have YOU and this platform for "Robust Engagement" and this "NEXTUS" to shift from a ME thing to a WE thing.
It’s a never ending battle to try and make others see what’s really going on. I have been recommending a video from Rosa Koire, behind the green mask, on YouTube. Everything she talked about in 2014 has all come true. It’s creepy
Who or how are these salary increases determined? If people stayed on the job, rather then attending these meetings to network in order to find a new position the taxpayers would be so much better off. Started during COVID should end now.
When I first heard about these forming, I think it was still during covid, I strongly suspected it was just another way to funnel $ to harm reduction and homeless services with many of the same players on the board. I am very curious to see what else you discover. https://www.coalitionofachs.org/
I would have loved to had "Hope Navigators" with me last night as I drove by Safeway on the way home form my second job at 9:30 last night and observed the store surrounded on all 4 sides by active drug use and dealing with clumps of individuals standing in fold, piles of "belongings" everywhere and a group openly huddled in the parking lot using a torch lighter with foil.
no, it was dark, I was in my car alone and did not want it to be spotted, and there were so many of them. A whole group was in the NE corner behind gas station with torch lighter, a cluster with bikes on east side of store, folks with tarps over their heads but legs out on the Laurel st side, a cluster standing not really upright in the alley looked the highest. The health dept parking lot on 3rd also had at least 6 "campers" all sort of swaying about. It was the largest number of folks I have seen in that area apparently absorbed in certain activities at once, it was shocking and I am used to seeing these activities in the area. I was tired but went home and stayed up late pondering the state of the city. edit to add, Tues and Fri are distribution days so Fri nights are like this too.
Susie, I’m really sorry you experienced this—and thank you for describing it so carefully. What you’re naming is disturbing, and it’s also important.
You’ve got me thinking about how powerful documented change over time can be. Not in the moment, not by putting anyone at risk, but by looking at patterns. The Lincoln Street Safeway is almost an ironic focal point because it’s such a long-standing community anchor.
I’m wondering whether anyone has photos of that area over the years—when the store was first built, different points in time since—so we could create a simple visual timeline. Pairing that kind of documentation with local, state, and federal policy shifts could help connect policy decisions to lived experience in a way that’s harder to dismiss.
What you described last night—and your note about Tuesday and Friday distribution days—feels like exactly the kind of real-world context that often gets lost when we talk about programs in the abstract.
Land Acknowledgement Warning: it’s at the top of Olympic Community of Health website: https://www.olympicch.org/ In case anyone didn’t know about the land we’ve been allowed to live on by the graciousness of the tribes, and pay taxes for the land that tribes don’t pay. LOL.
The glorification of our native American peoples leaves out the warring, enslavement, and expansion of the larger tribes at the expense of their neighbors. In later years we had the invasion of the different European and Asian peoples who used force, and monetary influence, to obtain possession of most of North America. (Florida. Louisiana, Gadsen Purchase, Alaska, and much of the western part of the later United States.) Now we read about efforts to return to an earlier geographic apportionment. Do we really believe any redistribution would be peaceful? Instead, we have attempts to legislate a redistribution of wealth. Who do you think would profit from this confrontation? If we as a society cannot coexist we will destroy our entire society. Be careful what you wish for.
For the record: land acknowledgements are not required to receive state or federal funding. They’re voluntary statements, not a legal or grant condition — and they don’t substitute for real consultation or statutory duties.
These sources collectively demonstrate that land acknowledgements are an optional expressive practice, not a statutory, regulatory, or funding requirement at the state or federal level.
References
Environmental Law Institute. (2024, September). Tribal consultation in Washington State (Part I: Summary of tribal relations governance).
*Public-facing explanation of land acknowledgements as educational and relational, not legal or compliance tools.
U.S. Department of the Interior. (2015). Department of the Interior policy on consultation with Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Corporations (512 DM 4).
Dr Sarah, thank you for the references. I read through some of them. The one below shocked me. IMO it doesn't try to improve a government to government relationship, it taunts it:
Native Governance Center A guide to Indigenous land acknowledgment
"Use appropriate language. Don’t sugarcoat the past. Use terms like genocide, ethnic cleansing, stolen land, and forced removal to reflect actions taken by colonizers.
There are many types of land acknowledgments. Don’t expect to find a specific formula or template. Land acknowledgments that come from Indigenous people vs. non-Indigenous people look different, too"
@Jennifer, I appreciate you reading the source and naming that reaction. I agree that your discomfort is valid. That piece from the Native Governance Center isn’t a governance framework—it’s Indigenous-led guidance for cultural or political expression, not for government-to-government practice. I cited it to show there is no single formula for land acknowledgments and why symbolic language can’t substitute for real relationships. When symbolism is treated as governance, it can harden positions rather than build trust. Meaningful government-to-government relationships are built through clear jurisdiction, mutual accountability, and enforceable agreements—not prescribed rhetoric.
Dr Sarah, I agree, it's not a governance framework, but the political expression itself conveys tones of hostility and accusations. Yes, the symbolism is hardening positions, not just in Clallam County but many counties where accountabilities of the Tribes are unattainable because of their sovereign status. It is difficult, but I try, to remove emotions, but words such as genocide, ethnic cleansing, stolen land, and forced removal are in themselves emotionally reactive. Agreed..."Meaningful government-to-government relationships are built through clear jurisdiction, mutual accountability, and enforceable agreements—not prescribed rhetoric" ; )
I have to print this out. Each Land Acknowledgment gets more absurd:
Land acknowledgement
Together, we acknowledge, with humility, the indigenous peoples whose presence permeates the waterways, shorelines, valleys, and mountains of the Olympic region. The land where we are is the territory of the Coast Salish Peoples, in particular the Chimacum, Hoh, Makah, S’Klallam, Suquamish, and Quileute tribes on whose sacred land we live, work, and play. Click here to learn more about the Indigenous land where you are.
There are many "Land Acknowledgments", not just for tribes but for NGO's, Universities, Restaurants etc. They all basically say the same. There is a site to download with a format on Land Acknowledgments.
The commissioners did not answer yesterday's question about WSAC pushing to tax short-term rentals. Here is today's email:
Dear Commissioners,
Can you clarify the criteria you use to determine residency for advisory board positions, and explain how those criteria were applied to the new appointee to the Heritage Advisory Board?
Below is a good-governance individual commissioner response clarifying advisory board residency standards and identifying needed follow-up to enhance transparency and accountability.
Dear Constituent,
Thank you for the question. The concerns raised in recent public commentary—including the article you reference—highlight a legitimate governance issue: how residency criteria for advisory board appointments are defined, applied, and explained to the public.
At the county level, advisory board appointments are made under the authority of the Board of County Commissioners and guided by the County’s Boards, Committees, and Commissions policy, along with the enabling documents for each board (Clallam County, n.d.-a; Clallam County, n.d.-b). Those documents establish process and purpose, but, specifically for the Heritage Advisory Board (HAB), the County’s publicly posted materials do not clearly define a residency standard—such as whether residency means primary domicile in Clallam County, district-based residence, or another criterion (Clallam County, n.d.-c).
Washington case law is clear that when residency is used as a qualification for public roles, it is generally understood as domicile, requiring both physical presence and intent to remain, and that eligibility criteria must be established in advance and applied uniformly, not informally or retroactively (MRSC, 2024; State ex rel. O’Connell v. Dubuque, 1966). While advisory boards differ from elected office, these principles still matter for public trust and procedural fairness.
From an accountability perspective, the appropriate governance response is not to dismiss public concern, but to clarify the process and correct any ambiguity. As an individual commissioner, I believe follow-up should include:
1. Public clarification of what residency standard, if any, is being used for HAB appointments and where that standard is defined.
2. Documentation in the public record explaining how that standard was applied in the recent appointment.
3. Review and, if necessary, amendment of the HAB’s governing language or appointment guidance so residency criteria are explicit, consistent, and transparent going forward.
Advisory boards are meant to reflect community trust and expertise. That trust is strengthened when the rules are clear, consistently applied, and explained openly—especially when questions arise. Accountability in governance is not about avoiding criticism; it is about responding to it with clarity, correction, and follow-through.
Sincerely,
Commissioner
Clallam County Board of Commissioners
References
Clallam County. (n.d.-a). Boards, committees, and commissions.
Where do I donate to Jake’s campaign ? I have got a lot of frustration in these commissioners gestapo actions.We need to get Jake elected to stop this corruption and money flow. Remember everyone get their neighbors and friends to VOTE these clowns out.10 votes each CCWD reader and we can do it. I am shooting for 20.Lets
I just sent some money to you. It is my first political donation in my 72 years of life. I must be getting old. No I believe we are going to get representation via Jake. Then we can write about some good stuff in our
Substack continues to be glitchy for some subscribers. I'm sorry for that, but I'm working on it with them. In the meantime, here is a post from someone who has lost their ability to post:
Jeff,
Just read your latest blog “Ousted by Ozias.” I tried to post a comment, but, being a technophobe, was unable to finish it.
Here is my comment. Feel free to post it or not.
After reading, “Ousted by Ozias,” my reaction was sadness.
1 – Kudos to one of your watchdoggers, Denise Lupio, for ferreting out what the commissioners wanted hidden.
2 – Derrick Eberle, who describes himself as a “farmer, designer of public space,” probably sought this position for resume enhancement. Given his background, why not seek one on a board dealing with land use?
3 – Apparently heritage advisory board members Mike Doherty, Paula Hunt and Bryon Monohon either continue to serve or extended their terms. They have and will take their role seriously.
4 – To make room for Ebererle, the commissioners needed to get rid of someone representing Eberle’s area. Judith Stipe, who, with her husband, has been quietly maintaining Sequim Museum & Arts, became that person. She (like Jeff Tozzer) represents a local pioneer family and helps preserve Sequim-Dungeness heritage.
5 – As a sop to Stipe, the commissioners shamelessly issued a proclamation in her honor. She deserves better – like being reappointed to the board in place of Eberle.
6 – What else could Lupio find hidden in those records?
Another epic incident where the County Commissioners do not listen to citizens. Ozias needs to go. He’s making his own rules as he goes along. Next people living in Tacoma will be able to run for office because they maintain a farm in Dungeness. This is wrong and more wrong to have black listed Judith Stipe who by all standards is far more qualified than Eberle. How much time does he have to serve citizens of this county when he lives in another county. It’s wrong ethically and morally. Ozias seems to be a one man commission lately.
Hello Beaver. Great to hear that you are still involved with our local activities. I agree with you. Now, we have to reverse the decision regarding Judith Stipe. For the last couple of years I have been preaching about meritocracy, especially in our schools. I have also been preaching about governance. An item apparently overlooked within our elected officials. By making noise we may be able to improve some of our omissions by our elected officials. Clallam County Watchdog attracts controversy, but it also informs people about ongoing problems. Thanks.
I was at the meeting yesterday and I sat next to a new attendee, when Mark Ozias would start his talk on anything the man next to me was saying "WTH in the world is he talking on and on about"
I told him I come prepare with a bottle of dressing for a "Mark" diatribe. So many wirds a so little to say with substance. I just wish we could his amount of words with real integrity. But I still wish they would end harm reduction in the way they blindly fund it while not looking at the wide swath of damage in it's wake. What he did to Judith is just all the Mark Ozias has to offer us damage and droning on...shameful.
Thank you Jeff and Denise.
I'm going to get more of the CC watchdog window stickers to hand out maybe a small fundraiser for Jake...
I couldn’t agree with you more. We need to say it with our votes and get these clowns out of here. It are literally killing our county I for one am appalled.
You are assuming they had votes to lose. I think they are actively cementing their own futures by the actions (we keep catching) that are bringing negative attention to the position of County Commissioners.
They don’t even attempt to be sneaky.
So is it arrogance or ignorance we are dealing with from our three blind mice?
A quick search on the WA Secretary of State website (for mailing and business addresses) and Pierce County Assessor (confirming his residence and mailing address) website clearly show Eberle maintains a home with mail delivered to his residence in Tacoma on Steele Street. Voter registration and drivers license anyone?
He is registered to vote in this county and receives his property tax bill for the barn property he inherited in 2013 at the barn address. Other websites indicate his mailing address to his Pierce county home. Ozias explained there are no residency requirements for advisory board positions.
The Clallam County Commissioners are out of touch. Too many reasons to list here. This one takes the cake for me. How and why would you so callously throw out Judith Stipe? Let the next election cycle determine the fate of Mark Osias and all commissioners. VOTE HIM OUT!
I had to ask myself why would Eberle want to be on the HERITAGE ADVISORY Board? What could be there, as unqualified as he was, that he even cared. As usual, follow the money….all the way to his property and his barn who is placed in the register of historic barns.
Historic Preservation Easement
2017-1351887
Grantor(s):Derrick Eberle
Grantee(s):Stateof Washington
Legal Description:PARCEL 4 SURVEY V8 P59 SUR V56 P6
Their are Heritage Barn GRANTS for restoration, it is Big money. VERY competitive. It goes in 2 year grant cycles. Usually the grant’s range in the $20,000 area, but can go up to as much as $75,000. He got a grant in 2017 for $11,321. You can apply for every cycle, but the chances of getting a grant is Extremely Competitive.
The 2025-2027 is past. I don’t believe he was awarded a grant for that cycle, but we have the 2027-2029 cycle coming up! The question is, can he use his position on the HERITAGE ADVISORY BOARD to his advantage? Below are snippets about the HERITAGE BARN GRANTS.
The Washington State Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation (DAHP) is pleased to announce that applications to request funding through the Heritage Barn Rehabilitation Grant Program are now available. For the FY 2025-2027 Biennium, $900,000 in matching grants are available with individual awards of up to $75,000. The grants are provided as part of the state’s Heritage Barn Preservation Initiative established in 2007, and the grant program assists with rehabilitation projects to stabilize and preserve designated Heritage Barns across the state.
FAQ: I applied previously and received a grant. Can/should I apply again?
Yes! Generally it is the policy of the Heritage Barn Advisory Committee to avoid awarding grant funds to the same building in two consecutive grant rounds, but you may apply for more funding after waiting at least one cycle.
Rehabilitation grants are awarded through a competitive application process: in six funding rounds, the Barn Advisory Committee has reviewed over four hundred grant applications. Criteria for funding include, but are not limited to, the historical significance of the barn, urgency of needed repairs, and provision for long-term preservation. Priority is given to barns that remain in agricultural use.
Only historic agricultural structures listed in the Heritage Barn Register, the Washington Heritage Register, or the National Register of Historic Places, are eligible to receive grant funds when they are available.
@JeffTozzer, I am happy to help fund @Jennifer's work if ya'll are available to meet me on Friday's between 1-4pm at 325 ½ W 2nd St, Port Angeles, WA 98362. FREE PIZZA, party gifts, and to-go bags will be provided. SORRY, I couldn't, not, not ;-)
Actually, I have been wanting to go there and order off the "menu" on a Tuesday(Fridays my lunch break is shorter) as taxpayer research but wishing I had someone else to go with. If anyone else is interested let me know. I haven't been inside since the old location before expanded services. I am curious if they are letting on site use slip by and to see the expanded offerings.
JJW he would be in a position for the flow of 2 kinds of funding. One would be from HERITAGE ADVISORY BOARD of Clallam County and in turn use the position to influence The Washington State Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation funding for his Barn. He gets a twofer.
AHA! Wow, Jennifer. You nailed it! It blows me away to see how many intelligent, awake, human beings there are in this community, all working together to inform each other about what's really going on around here. No wonder the commissioners say it's "scary" when we speak up.
After seeing Judith accept the proclamation with aplomb, everyone in that crowded room knew that she still belongs on the Heritage Advisory Board. What a disgraceful exhibit of betrayal by the three Commissioners. As Jeff aptly stated in his public comment, this just wasn't Ozias' doing, French and Johnson voted to replace Judith Stipe with Derrick Eberle. Very shameful as Judith is still capable of doing her job. Our eyes are on the HAB now that we know what is really going on.
When Jeff looked directly at them for their part in her coup, they genuinely looked stunned. They didn't expect to be named accomplices in Ozias's power play.
Easier to GO ALONG to GET ALONG. Johnson & French are weak kneed, always have been for as long as I’ve attended BOCC meetings. Nothing new. Can’t recall a time there has been push back or dissension with these clowns. When the public vocally, in writing, present petitions have valid concerns against county levy’s, taxes, appointments, expenditures, appointments, roads and you name it they have been ignored & dismissed, even called names and attacked in hallways. Commissioners cavalier comments or stating I’ve already decided the night before a meeting without hearing public comments is WEAK! Commissioners comments: we hear what you’re saying, we acknowledge your concerns, we read all your letters, we appreciate your speaking up…….BUT
I look forward to learning a lot from Judith Stipe in the future. If she chooses to inform the public she will no doubt be labeled a sour grapes loser. That sounds like a fine wine to me.
I agree. However, better for who? Certainly not the majority of county citizens. The other two commissioners need to grow a pair, which will not happen. Randy Johnson has been such a disappointment to me. I can not understand why he goes along.
1n 2020 , I applied for a bunch of Boards and Commissions. Randy Johnson called me and applied the obvious filter. I never heard a word back. At least this time I got a zoom interview.
Eberle is being jammed down the throats of Clallam County Citizens. Ozias, of all people should know that does not endear
Eberle to the masses.
Sometimes I feel Ozias is on the spectrum. He can’t seem to read the room much less the emails. There is something going on that doesn’t make sense. Why encourage folks to dislike you, Ozias? We are capable of doing that by following your accomplishments while in office.
(Someone help me out, I do not know of positive accomplishments)
Force someone qualified and good at her job out. Make it difficult or impossible for those who risk their own resources and use their own abilities to provide housing in Clallam County for others. Complain about housing affordability, etc.. Tax residents out of their proprieties for NGO non-accountable funded housing to compete and replace private individuals who are no burden to taxpayers.
Pattern here? John Worthington provided all we need to know yesterday - “NODC , SERN and Puget Sound Partnerships Reps. Heidi Eisenhower Angela Gore and Josh Chapman.” The death cults and cultists.
@JeffTozzer, for the record and to answer your question about "the Olympic Community of Health":
The Olympic Community of Health (OCH) is a regional nonprofit (501(c)(3)) serving Clallam, Jefferson, and Kitsap counties, created under Washington State’s Medicaid Transformation / Accountable Community of Health (ACH) model. OCH is not an elected body; it functions as a coordinating and funding hub for health- and social-service initiatives across the region, supported largely by state and federal Medicaid-related funding, grants, and service contracts.
https://www.olympicch.org/
On January 26, OCH hosted or sponsored “The Power of HOPE” at Peninsula College, featuring Chan Hellman, a researcher known for developing the Science of Hope framework. The 2.5-hour session focused on applying hope-based concepts to resilience, well-being, and community practice, including a discussion of “Hope Navigator” training.
Event details: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DEGf-GTniSbwYUDH_Q9FdCNiK4lPG5tHkNFSpxK5uUg/edit
Hope this helps to clarify things ;-)
Thank you, Dr. Sarah. You KNOW that was going to drive me nuts until I figured it out.
It takes one to know one!
If you haven't noticed my increased involvement in the comment sections, I might have to set some boundaries and practice what I preach with prohealth "sustainable" behavior and cut myself off from my "RABID" CC Watchdogging. I can't help myself from getting sucked down the rabbit hole trying to set the records(ssssss) straight in this county; it's never-ending, but thank goodness we have YOU and this platform for "Robust Engagement" and this "NEXTUS" to shift from a ME thing to a WE thing.
PLEASE keep commenting! We are learning so much from you!!
It’s a never ending battle to try and make others see what’s really going on. I have been recommending a video from Rosa Koire, behind the green mask, on YouTube. Everything she talked about in 2014 has all come true. It’s creepy
Financial snapshot from Form 990s:
2024:
• Total revenue: $6.39M
• Total expenses: $4.71M
• Net assets: $8.62M
2023:
• Total revenue: $2.66M
• Operating deficit reported that year
Revenue sources are primarily grants/contributions and program service revenue tied to government-funded initiatives.
Staff & compensation:
Celeste Schoenthaler – Executive Director
• 2024 compensation: $170,716
• 2023 compensation: $154,861
• 2022 compensation: $150,277
Board members are generally reported with $0 compensation, consistent with volunteer governance roles.
references
IRS: https://apps.irs.gov/app/eos/details/
ProPublica: https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/814591222
Who or how are these salary increases determined? If people stayed on the job, rather then attending these meetings to network in order to find a new position the taxpayers would be so much better off. Started during COVID should end now.
You are a wealth of information, Dr. Sarah, and I appreciate all of the research you share. Keep digging!
Good job Denise.
When I first heard about these forming, I think it was still during covid, I strongly suspected it was just another way to funnel $ to harm reduction and homeless services with many of the same players on the board. I am very curious to see what else you discover. https://www.coalitionofachs.org/
I would have loved to had "Hope Navigators" with me last night as I drove by Safeway on the way home form my second job at 9:30 last night and observed the store surrounded on all 4 sides by active drug use and dealing with clumps of individuals standing in fold, piles of "belongings" everywhere and a group openly huddled in the parking lot using a torch lighter with foil.
Did you get a picture of this by chance?
no, it was dark, I was in my car alone and did not want it to be spotted, and there were so many of them. A whole group was in the NE corner behind gas station with torch lighter, a cluster with bikes on east side of store, folks with tarps over their heads but legs out on the Laurel st side, a cluster standing not really upright in the alley looked the highest. The health dept parking lot on 3rd also had at least 6 "campers" all sort of swaying about. It was the largest number of folks I have seen in that area apparently absorbed in certain activities at once, it was shocking and I am used to seeing these activities in the area. I was tired but went home and stayed up late pondering the state of the city. edit to add, Tues and Fri are distribution days so Fri nights are like this too.
Susie, I’m really sorry you experienced this—and thank you for describing it so carefully. What you’re naming is disturbing, and it’s also important.
You’ve got me thinking about how powerful documented change over time can be. Not in the moment, not by putting anyone at risk, but by looking at patterns. The Lincoln Street Safeway is almost an ironic focal point because it’s such a long-standing community anchor.
I’m wondering whether anyone has photos of that area over the years—when the store was first built, different points in time since—so we could create a simple visual timeline. Pairing that kind of documentation with local, state, and federal policy shifts could help connect policy decisions to lived experience in a way that’s harder to dismiss.
What you described last night—and your note about Tuesday and Friday distribution days—feels like exactly the kind of real-world context that often gets lost when we talk about programs in the abstract.
Susie, it's Steven King fodder. Scarier than his novels, but it isn't fiction.
It is a very dark energy indeed. I felt the need to stand out in my yard in the cold doing some grounding to shake it off.
Wise, Susie. Stay safe and thank you for sharing your scary experiences.
Susie, it sounds like they were playing with the party favors we hand out.
yep, on Tuesdays we fetty fold 'round here
Land Acknowledgement Warning: it’s at the top of Olympic Community of Health website: https://www.olympicch.org/ In case anyone didn’t know about the land we’ve been allowed to live on by the graciousness of the tribes, and pay taxes for the land that tribes don’t pay. LOL.
The glorification of our native American peoples leaves out the warring, enslavement, and expansion of the larger tribes at the expense of their neighbors. In later years we had the invasion of the different European and Asian peoples who used force, and monetary influence, to obtain possession of most of North America. (Florida. Louisiana, Gadsen Purchase, Alaska, and much of the western part of the later United States.) Now we read about efforts to return to an earlier geographic apportionment. Do we really believe any redistribution would be peaceful? Instead, we have attempts to legislate a redistribution of wealth. Who do you think would profit from this confrontation? If we as a society cannot coexist we will destroy our entire society. Be careful what you wish for.
Likely a condition of receiving state dollars.
For the record: land acknowledgements are not required to receive state or federal funding. They’re voluntary statements, not a legal or grant condition — and they don’t substitute for real consultation or statutory duties.
These sources collectively demonstrate that land acknowledgements are an optional expressive practice, not a statutory, regulatory, or funding requirement at the state or federal level.
References
Environmental Law Institute. (2024, September). Tribal consultation in Washington State (Part I: Summary of tribal relations governance).
https://www.eli.org/sites/default/files/files-pdf/Tribal%20Consultation%20in%20Washington.pdf
*Comprehensive overview of Washington’s tribal consultation frameworks; distinguishes legal consultation obligations from ceremonial practices.
Native Governance Center. (2019, October 22). A guide to Indigenous land acknowledgment.
https://nativegov.org/news/a-guide-to-indigenous-land-acknowledgment/
*Explicitly frames land acknowledgements as voluntary and not substitutes for action or legal duties.
Pleasant Grove City v. Summum, 555 U.S. 460 (2009).
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-665.ZS.html
*Establishes government speech doctrine; ceremonial or expressive statements are discretionary, not mandated.
Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian. (2020, August 20). Land acknowledgment.
https://americanindian.si.edu/nk360/informational/land-acknowledgment
*Public-facing explanation of land acknowledgements as educational and relational, not legal or compliance tools.
U.S. Department of the Interior. (2015). Department of the Interior policy on consultation with Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Corporations (512 DM 4).
https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/512-dm-4-department-of-the-interior-policy-on-consultation-with-indian-tribes.pdf
*Federal consultation policy emphasizing substantive engagement, not symbolic statements.
Washington State Department of Commerce. (2024, April 18). Tribal planning.
https://www.commerce.wa.gov/growth-management/tribal-planning/
*Explains engagement and consultation expectations for local governments.
Washington State Governor’s Office of Indian Affairs. (n.d.). Centennial Accord.
https://goia.wa.gov/state-tribal-relations-centennial-accord/centennial-accord
*Establishes government-to-government relations and consultation principles; does not mandate land acknowledgements.
Washington State Legislature. (2020). RCW 43.376: Office of Equity.
https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=43.376
*Requires equity integration in state policy and programs; contains no requirement for land acknowledgements as a compliance or funding condition.
Washington State Office of Equity. (n.d.). Treaties.
https://equity.wa.gov/treaties
*Provides historical and governance context, including the Centennial Accord.
Dr Sarah, thank you for the references. I read through some of them. The one below shocked me. IMO it doesn't try to improve a government to government relationship, it taunts it:
https://nativegov.org/news/a-guide-to-indigenous-land-acknowledgment/
Native Governance Center A guide to Indigenous land acknowledgment
"Use appropriate language. Don’t sugarcoat the past. Use terms like genocide, ethnic cleansing, stolen land, and forced removal to reflect actions taken by colonizers.
There are many types of land acknowledgments. Don’t expect to find a specific formula or template. Land acknowledgments that come from Indigenous people vs. non-Indigenous people look different, too"
@Jennifer, I appreciate you reading the source and naming that reaction. I agree that your discomfort is valid. That piece from the Native Governance Center isn’t a governance framework—it’s Indigenous-led guidance for cultural or political expression, not for government-to-government practice. I cited it to show there is no single formula for land acknowledgments and why symbolic language can’t substitute for real relationships. When symbolism is treated as governance, it can harden positions rather than build trust. Meaningful government-to-government relationships are built through clear jurisdiction, mutual accountability, and enforceable agreements—not prescribed rhetoric.
Dr Sarah, I agree, it's not a governance framework, but the political expression itself conveys tones of hostility and accusations. Yes, the symbolism is hardening positions, not just in Clallam County but many counties where accountabilities of the Tribes are unattainable because of their sovereign status. It is difficult, but I try, to remove emotions, but words such as genocide, ethnic cleansing, stolen land, and forced removal are in themselves emotionally reactive. Agreed..."Meaningful government-to-government relationships are built through clear jurisdiction, mutual accountability, and enforceable agreements—not prescribed rhetoric" ; )
I have to print this out. Each Land Acknowledgment gets more absurd:
Land acknowledgement
Together, we acknowledge, with humility, the indigenous peoples whose presence permeates the waterways, shorelines, valleys, and mountains of the Olympic region. The land where we are is the territory of the Coast Salish Peoples, in particular the Chimacum, Hoh, Makah, S’Klallam, Suquamish, and Quileute tribes on whose sacred land we live, work, and play. Click here to learn more about the Indigenous land where you are.
Maybe it’s a competition to see who can create the most absurd acknowledgement. LOL.
That link shown in this acknowledgment is a Canadian site and includes all of the Indigenous tribes/lands in N. America.
There are many "Land Acknowledgments", not just for tribes but for NGO's, Universities, Restaurants etc. They all basically say the same. There is a site to download with a format on Land Acknowledgments.
The commissioners did not answer yesterday's question about WSAC pushing to tax short-term rentals. Here is today's email:
Dear Commissioners,
Can you clarify the criteria you use to determine residency for advisory board positions, and explain how those criteria were applied to the new appointee to the Heritage Advisory Board?
Below is a good-governance individual commissioner response clarifying advisory board residency standards and identifying needed follow-up to enhance transparency and accountability.
Dear Constituent,
Thank you for the question. The concerns raised in recent public commentary—including the article you reference—highlight a legitimate governance issue: how residency criteria for advisory board appointments are defined, applied, and explained to the public.
At the county level, advisory board appointments are made under the authority of the Board of County Commissioners and guided by the County’s Boards, Committees, and Commissions policy, along with the enabling documents for each board (Clallam County, n.d.-a; Clallam County, n.d.-b). Those documents establish process and purpose, but, specifically for the Heritage Advisory Board (HAB), the County’s publicly posted materials do not clearly define a residency standard—such as whether residency means primary domicile in Clallam County, district-based residence, or another criterion (Clallam County, n.d.-c).
Washington case law is clear that when residency is used as a qualification for public roles, it is generally understood as domicile, requiring both physical presence and intent to remain, and that eligibility criteria must be established in advance and applied uniformly, not informally or retroactively (MRSC, 2024; State ex rel. O’Connell v. Dubuque, 1966). While advisory boards differ from elected office, these principles still matter for public trust and procedural fairness.
From an accountability perspective, the appropriate governance response is not to dismiss public concern, but to clarify the process and correct any ambiguity. As an individual commissioner, I believe follow-up should include:
1. Public clarification of what residency standard, if any, is being used for HAB appointments and where that standard is defined.
2. Documentation in the public record explaining how that standard was applied in the recent appointment.
3. Review and, if necessary, amendment of the HAB’s governing language or appointment guidance so residency criteria are explicit, consistent, and transparent going forward.
Advisory boards are meant to reflect community trust and expertise. That trust is strengthened when the rules are clear, consistently applied, and explained openly—especially when questions arise. Accountability in governance is not about avoiding criticism; it is about responding to it with clarity, correction, and follow-through.
Sincerely,
Commissioner
Clallam County Board of Commissioners
References
Clallam County. (n.d.-a). Boards, committees, and commissions.
https://www.clallamcountywa.gov/636/Boards-Committees-and-Commissions
Clallam County. (n.d.-b). Boards and committees policy (Policy 952).
https://www.clallamcountywa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/3126/Boards-and-Committees-PDF
Clallam County. (n.d.-c). Heritage Advisory Board (HAB).
https://www.clallamcountywa.gov/737/Heritage-Advisory-Board-HAB
Municipal Research and Services Center. (2024). Residency requirements for local government officials and appointees.
https://mrsc.org/stay-informed/mrsc-insight/january-2024/residency-requirements-officials-appointees
State ex rel. O’Connell v. Dubuque, 68 Wn.2d 553, 413 P.2d 972 (1966).
Washington State Auditor’s Office. (n.d.). Trust, but verify: A guide for elected officials & appointed boards to prevent fraud.
https://sao.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2023-04/Trust-but-verify-Fraud-prevention-guide.pdf
Washington State Auditor’s Office. (n.d.). Internal control (BARS Cash Manual).
https://sao.wa.gov/bars-annual-filing/bars-cash-manual/accounting/accounting-principles-and-internal-control/internal-control
But is this really coming from our commissioners or is it one that they should be writing?
In my humble opinion, an option for the commissioners to use or a modeled response for them to edit to their understanding, if that makes sense.
Where do I donate to Jake’s campaign ? I have got a lot of frustration in these commissioners gestapo actions.We need to get Jake elected to stop this corruption and money flow. Remember everyone get their neighbors and friends to VOTE these clowns out.10 votes each CCWD reader and we can do it. I am shooting for 20.Lets
go Jake there is a lot at stake.
https://www.jakeseegers.com/
I just sent some money to you. It is my first political donation in my 72 years of life. I must be getting old. No I believe we are going to get representation via Jake. Then we can write about some good stuff in our
Abode.
Thanks, Jed. I'm all in on Jake. We won't let you down.
Good Governance Daily Proverb:
Strong institutions do not fear questions. They fear unanswered ones—and the temptation to silence the questioner instead.
*The issue isn’t disagreement; it’s what happens when governance responds by removing voices rather than responding to substance.
Substack continues to be glitchy for some subscribers. I'm sorry for that, but I'm working on it with them. In the meantime, here is a post from someone who has lost their ability to post:
Jeff,
Just read your latest blog “Ousted by Ozias.” I tried to post a comment, but, being a technophobe, was unable to finish it.
Here is my comment. Feel free to post it or not.
After reading, “Ousted by Ozias,” my reaction was sadness.
1 – Kudos to one of your watchdoggers, Denise Lupio, for ferreting out what the commissioners wanted hidden.
2 – Derrick Eberle, who describes himself as a “farmer, designer of public space,” probably sought this position for resume enhancement. Given his background, why not seek one on a board dealing with land use?
3 – Apparently heritage advisory board members Mike Doherty, Paula Hunt and Bryon Monohon either continue to serve or extended their terms. They have and will take their role seriously.
4 – To make room for Ebererle, the commissioners needed to get rid of someone representing Eberle’s area. Judith Stipe, who, with her husband, has been quietly maintaining Sequim Museum & Arts, became that person. She (like Jeff Tozzer) represents a local pioneer family and helps preserve Sequim-Dungeness heritage.
5 – As a sop to Stipe, the commissioners shamelessly issued a proclamation in her honor. She deserves better – like being reappointed to the board in place of Eberle.
6 – What else could Lupio find hidden in those records?
Another epic incident where the County Commissioners do not listen to citizens. Ozias needs to go. He’s making his own rules as he goes along. Next people living in Tacoma will be able to run for office because they maintain a farm in Dungeness. This is wrong and more wrong to have black listed Judith Stipe who by all standards is far more qualified than Eberle. How much time does he have to serve citizens of this county when he lives in another county. It’s wrong ethically and morally. Ozias seems to be a one man commission lately.
Hello Beaver. Great to hear that you are still involved with our local activities. I agree with you. Now, we have to reverse the decision regarding Judith Stipe. For the last couple of years I have been preaching about meritocracy, especially in our schools. I have also been preaching about governance. An item apparently overlooked within our elected officials. By making noise we may be able to improve some of our omissions by our elected officials. Clallam County Watchdog attracts controversy, but it also informs people about ongoing problems. Thanks.
Good morning Jeff,
I was at the meeting yesterday and I sat next to a new attendee, when Mark Ozias would start his talk on anything the man next to me was saying "WTH in the world is he talking on and on about"
I told him I come prepare with a bottle of dressing for a "Mark" diatribe. So many wirds a so little to say with substance. I just wish we could his amount of words with real integrity. But I still wish they would end harm reduction in the way they blindly fund it while not looking at the wide swath of damage in it's wake. What he did to Judith is just all the Mark Ozias has to offer us damage and droning on...shameful.
Thank you Jeff and Denise.
I'm going to get more of the CC watchdog window stickers to hand out maybe a small fundraiser for Jake...
Have a great day all!
Where can I get a CC watchdog sticker?
Get a Jake Seegers campaign button while you're at it.
Eric Feurman made the buttons
I've got both... I'm ordering stickers again today for the 4" tall ones. See if I can get a price for them
Straight signs in Sequim on south 3rd
I purchased bumper stickers for .99 each from Imprint. They say retail is $4.99
Thought Vista print would be good, but not. Be sure you get a size that fits in to standard envelopes.
On U-Line they have a huge variety but not the size I needed. But the best prices for a retail purchase. A lesson for others.
Vista Print was a good vendor a few years ago, not anymore. The prices are crazy.
I'll have some later today...but I got them made at Straight signs in Sequim.
I have 20 ccw stickers now...ready to hand out!
What a shame and another slap in the face. I have known Judy for years and I weep for her.
Let's vote all them of them OUT1
I couldn’t agree with you more. We need to say it with our votes and get these clowns out of here. It are literally killing our county I for one am appalled.
Walter, as I understand it, people respect Judy. The commissioners just lost many votes and what little respect was left.
Hey Jennifer,
You are assuming they had votes to lose. I think they are actively cementing their own futures by the actions (we keep catching) that are bringing negative attention to the position of County Commissioners.
They don’t even attempt to be sneaky.
So is it arrogance or ignorance we are dealing with from our three blind mice?
A quick search on the WA Secretary of State website (for mailing and business addresses) and Pierce County Assessor (confirming his residence and mailing address) website clearly show Eberle maintains a home with mail delivered to his residence in Tacoma on Steele Street. Voter registration and drivers license anyone?
Grrrrrr!
Rita, so he is not registered to vote in Clallam County? Excuse me while I lean over my office waste receptacle.
So much vomiting goes on here. No rules apply when the commissioners “illegally appoint someone to office”.
I want to know what Eberle has on these guys because they (BOCCC) sure are accommodating him!
I don't know whether he's registered to vote in Clallam or Pierce County, but if that's confirmable it would be another piece of the residency puzzle.
He is registered to vote in this county and receives his property tax bill for the barn property he inherited in 2013 at the barn address. Other websites indicate his mailing address to his Pierce county home. Ozias explained there are no residency requirements for advisory board positions.
EXACTLY.
Quid pro road...
Ha!
In Ozias's case, "Squid pro quo"
<3
The Clallam County Commissioners are out of touch. Too many reasons to list here. This one takes the cake for me. How and why would you so callously throw out Judith Stipe? Let the next election cycle determine the fate of Mark Osias and all commissioners. VOTE HIM OUT!
They need someone to put a fork in the pioneer spirit and replace it with the European colonizer view.
Treating the historical pioneer as this horrible European colonizer.
I had to ask myself why would Eberle want to be on the HERITAGE ADVISORY Board? What could be there, as unqualified as he was, that he even cared. As usual, follow the money….all the way to his property and his barn who is placed in the register of historic barns.
Historic Preservation Easement
2017-1351887
Grantor(s):Derrick Eberle
Grantee(s):Stateof Washington
Legal Description:PARCEL 4 SURVEY V8 P59 SUR V56 P6
Their are Heritage Barn GRANTS for restoration, it is Big money. VERY competitive. It goes in 2 year grant cycles. Usually the grant’s range in the $20,000 area, but can go up to as much as $75,000. He got a grant in 2017 for $11,321. You can apply for every cycle, but the chances of getting a grant is Extremely Competitive.
https://dahp.wa.gov/sites/default/files/BarnBook_Final_small.pdf
PAGE 162-165
HERITAGE BARNS
EBERLE FARM | Clallam County
BARN NAME | Eberle Barn
PROJECT COST | $22,642
GRANT AWARD* | $11,321
GRANT COMPLETED | June, 2017
CURRENT USE | Agriculture
The 2025-2027 is past. I don’t believe he was awarded a grant for that cycle, but we have the 2027-2029 cycle coming up! The question is, can he use his position on the HERITAGE ADVISORY BOARD to his advantage? Below are snippets about the HERITAGE BARN GRANTS.
Heritage Barn Grants
https://dahp.wa.gov/historic-registers/heritage-barn-register/heritage-barn-grants
The Washington State Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation (DAHP) is pleased to announce that applications to request funding through the Heritage Barn Rehabilitation Grant Program are now available. For the FY 2025-2027 Biennium, $900,000 in matching grants are available with individual awards of up to $75,000. The grants are provided as part of the state’s Heritage Barn Preservation Initiative established in 2007, and the grant program assists with rehabilitation projects to stabilize and preserve designated Heritage Barns across the state.
FAQ: I applied previously and received a grant. Can/should I apply again?
Yes! Generally it is the policy of the Heritage Barn Advisory Committee to avoid awarding grant funds to the same building in two consecutive grant rounds, but you may apply for more funding after waiting at least one cycle.
Rehabilitation grants are awarded through a competitive application process: in six funding rounds, the Barn Advisory Committee has reviewed over four hundred grant applications. Criteria for funding include, but are not limited to, the historical significance of the barn, urgency of needed repairs, and provision for long-term preservation. Priority is given to barns that remain in agricultural use.
Only historic agricultural structures listed in the Heritage Barn Register, the Washington Heritage Register, or the National Register of Historic Places, are eligible to receive grant funds when they are available.
I need to put you on the CCWD payroll. Good job, Jennifer.
I work for PIZZA.
@JeffTozzer, I am happy to help fund @Jennifer's work if ya'll are available to meet me on Friday's between 1-4pm at 325 ½ W 2nd St, Port Angeles, WA 98362. FREE PIZZA, party gifts, and to-go bags will be provided. SORRY, I couldn't, not, not ;-)
Dr Sarah, you are so kind, but I can't make it. If you bring bananas you might have someone swing in and find fault with your gesture ; )
@Jennifer, I am so sorry to hear that you can't make it maybe this option works better?
Harm Reduction Health Center offered at Clallam County Public Health Services in Forks:
140 C Street, Forks, WA 98331
Hours
M, 11am-2:30pm.
(360) 374-3121
Dr Sarah, I can't resist this one. Will it be served Boofet style? Thanks again, but you guys have fun!
Can you provide a two can beer 🎩?
Actually, I have been wanting to go there and order off the "menu" on a Tuesday(Fridays my lunch break is shorter) as taxpayer research but wishing I had someone else to go with. If anyone else is interested let me know. I haven't been inside since the old location before expanded services. I am curious if they are letting on site use slip by and to see the expanded offerings.
I just don't know how you were able to find all that information so quickly. You must have a dishwasher :)
Dog Wash with a view
panhandling prop wash
lmao
So now we have someone in a position to influence the direction of the flow of funds of which he has been a previous recipient.
JJW he would be in a position for the flow of 2 kinds of funding. One would be from HERITAGE ADVISORY BOARD of Clallam County and in turn use the position to influence The Washington State Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation funding for his Barn. He gets a twofer.
so maybe more $ in grants than wedding venues these days?
Susie, Perhaps a Clallam County NGO wedding venue. They are all actually sleeping in the same bed, might as well consummate it.
good one
Or adding to the allure that his venue is historic.
WOW! Another gem!
AHA! Wow, Jennifer. You nailed it! It blows me away to see how many intelligent, awake, human beings there are in this community, all working together to inform each other about what's really going on around here. No wonder the commissioners say it's "scary" when we speak up.
After seeing Judith accept the proclamation with aplomb, everyone in that crowded room knew that she still belongs on the Heritage Advisory Board. What a disgraceful exhibit of betrayal by the three Commissioners. As Jeff aptly stated in his public comment, this just wasn't Ozias' doing, French and Johnson voted to replace Judith Stipe with Derrick Eberle. Very shameful as Judith is still capable of doing her job. Our eyes are on the HAB now that we know what is really going on.
It's absolutely disgusting behavior, not only by Ozias, but how is it that French and Johnson can just sit there and allow it?
When Jeff looked directly at them for their part in her coup, they genuinely looked stunned. They didn't expect to be named accomplices in Ozias's power play.
They're screwing up big time. This is absolutely stunning at its core. Feeble, weak kneed, complicit, just outrageous behavior.
This is the chummy problem with 3 commissioners, IMO. Neither of those two can recognize when Ozias is playing them.
Easier to GO ALONG to GET ALONG. Johnson & French are weak kneed, always have been for as long as I’ve attended BOCC meetings. Nothing new. Can’t recall a time there has been push back or dissension with these clowns. When the public vocally, in writing, present petitions have valid concerns against county levy’s, taxes, appointments, expenditures, appointments, roads and you name it they have been ignored & dismissed, even called names and attacked in hallways. Commissioners cavalier comments or stating I’ve already decided the night before a meeting without hearing public comments is WEAK! Commissioners comments: we hear what you’re saying, we acknowledge your concerns, we read all your letters, we appreciate your speaking up…….BUT
just doesn’t cut it!
Translation, not enough of the energy expended here is being put to use.
They have the kneepads
I look forward to learning a lot from Judith Stipe in the future. If she chooses to inform the public she will no doubt be labeled a sour grapes loser. That sounds like a fine wine to me.
Fine wine to me too!! CHEERS!!!
Maybe Ozias is looking at Eberle to take his place as commissioner when he moves onto bigger and better?
I agree. However, better for who? Certainly not the majority of county citizens. The other two commissioners need to grow a pair, which will not happen. Randy Johnson has been such a disappointment to me. I can not understand why he goes along.
1n 2020 , I applied for a bunch of Boards and Commissions. Randy Johnson called me and applied the obvious filter. I never heard a word back. At least this time I got a zoom interview.
Alright! Which Boards, John?
Can't recall the exact ones in 2020 but this year I applied for the Planning Commission, Parks board, and Homeless board.
Fingers crossed
They have appointed Miller to the Planning Commission for that same reason. Globalist grooming process.
I wouldn’t call county lock-up a big and better place. But it is certainly what he deserves!
Eberle is being jammed down the throats of Clallam County Citizens. Ozias, of all people should know that does not endear
Eberle to the masses.
Sometimes I feel Ozias is on the spectrum. He can’t seem to read the room much less the emails. There is something going on that doesn’t make sense. Why encourage folks to dislike you, Ozias? We are capable of doing that by following your accomplishments while in office.
(Someone help me out, I do not know of positive accomplishments)
Force someone qualified and good at her job out. Make it difficult or impossible for those who risk their own resources and use their own abilities to provide housing in Clallam County for others. Complain about housing affordability, etc.. Tax residents out of their proprieties for NGO non-accountable funded housing to compete and replace private individuals who are no burden to taxpayers.
Pattern here? John Worthington provided all we need to know yesterday - “NODC , SERN and Puget Sound Partnerships Reps. Heidi Eisenhower Angela Gore and Josh Chapman.” The death cults and cultists.
In collusion with at least one local tribe.