A 50-year League of Women Voters leader and $1,000 Mike French donor is circulating misrepresentations about his opponent while the organization insists it remains nonpartisan
If the LWV is as nonpartisan as they claim: then why do they openly advocate towards one party's position, while slanderously villifying anyone, and everyone, who questions their vastly superior opinions about everything?!
Crowley is an example of what is wrong with the FAR left. Ruin CC with her agenda that has NO common sense. Transgender athletes competing in girls sports is supported by only 20% in polls. I am having a difficult time with where is the uproar by women in this world of destruction of the majority of competition. Women’s sports have come along way yet they are on the edge of anarchy. Look at the WNBA finals. Women running of the court when they play the National Anthem. America needs to change direction and Jeff’s article explains WHY. The LWV should lose any tax exempt status with their actions.
I wonder how women in Muslim countries feel if they wish to participate in sports activities? Maybe some of our protesters should visit one of these countries and see, first hand, what women must accept as "normal".
I want to disclose another example of lies and deceit within our community. All the protests regarding the political attacks are one-sided. There is NO neutrality within the League of Women Voters. Tell it like it is.
Showing false colors. Sept 4, 2026.
Years ago a ship flying false colors was considered a pirate, or at least untrustworthy. Our League of Women Voters fly false colors. They also have tremendous influence regarding our voting process. The Question is, are they untrustworthy? Can we voters consider a group, blatantly biased, useful in our voting process?
What do you want for advice? If you only get one side of the argument, often untruthful, how can they have so much power? Are we voters so gullible that these biased, often false, claims need to be challenged. Where is the truth? We voters should start to question the actions of the League.
I have been reading about the “new” Democratic Socialist Party. Maybe we could call it the “Communist” party and see the true colors. Unfortunately, our voters don’t seem to read the small print. Repeatedly we read about prejudicial comments disguised as truth, as neutral comments, when the slightest challenge is met with indignant protest. How much information do you need? When one reads the list of officers, and their history, we see a repeated example of left-leaning, harmful, influence in our voting process. We voters should point out each statement from the League of Women Voters and challenge their position that they are not biased. I even ask for a challenge on truthfulness.
The 2026-2028 Leaders Guide instructs every League to plan around a campaign titled “Women Defend Democracy: Democracy Under Siege.” It declares a constitutional crisis as of April 17, 2025, and lists six prongs: Voting Rights, Election Protection, Redistricting, Individual Liberties, Immigration, and The Presidency.
The language is not the measured tone of a civic league. It is mobilization language: democracy is under “coordinated attack,” institutions face “direct and sustained threats,” and the League is “uniquely positioned to fight back.” Local chapters are not invited to debate whether that framing is accurate. They are told to implement it.
If the LWV is as nonpartisan as they claim: then why do they openly advocate towards one party's position, while slanderously villifying anyone, and everyone, who questions their vastly superior opinions about everything?!
Didn't change the way I filled my ballot out. I said on this group when Jake Announced to run he had four votes from my house and that's what he got.
Crowley is an example of what is wrong with the FAR left. Ruin CC with her agenda that has NO common sense. Transgender athletes competing in girls sports is supported by only 20% in polls. I am having a difficult time with where is the uproar by women in this world of destruction of the majority of competition. Women’s sports have come along way yet they are on the edge of anarchy. Look at the WNBA finals. Women running of the court when they play the National Anthem. America needs to change direction and Jeff’s article explains WHY. The LWV should lose any tax exempt status with their actions.
I wonder how women in Muslim countries feel if they wish to participate in sports activities? Maybe some of our protesters should visit one of these countries and see, first hand, what women must accept as "normal".
I want to disclose another example of lies and deceit within our community. All the protests regarding the political attacks are one-sided. There is NO neutrality within the League of Women Voters. Tell it like it is.
Showing false colors. Sept 4, 2026.
Years ago a ship flying false colors was considered a pirate, or at least untrustworthy. Our League of Women Voters fly false colors. They also have tremendous influence regarding our voting process. The Question is, are they untrustworthy? Can we voters consider a group, blatantly biased, useful in our voting process?
What do you want for advice? If you only get one side of the argument, often untruthful, how can they have so much power? Are we voters so gullible that these biased, often false, claims need to be challenged. Where is the truth? We voters should start to question the actions of the League.
I have been reading about the “new” Democratic Socialist Party. Maybe we could call it the “Communist” party and see the true colors. Unfortunately, our voters don’t seem to read the small print. Repeatedly we read about prejudicial comments disguised as truth, as neutral comments, when the slightest challenge is met with indignant protest. How much information do you need? When one reads the list of officers, and their history, we see a repeated example of left-leaning, harmful, influence in our voting process. We voters should point out each statement from the League of Women Voters and challenge their position that they are not biased. I even ask for a challenge on truthfulness.
The 2026-2028 Leaders Guide instructs every League to plan around a campaign titled “Women Defend Democracy: Democracy Under Siege.” It declares a constitutional crisis as of April 17, 2025, and lists six prongs: Voting Rights, Election Protection, Redistricting, Individual Liberties, Immigration, and The Presidency.
The language is not the measured tone of a civic league. It is mobilization language: democracy is under “coordinated attack,” institutions face “direct and sustained threats,” and the League is “uniquely positioned to fight back.” Local chapters are not invited to debate whether that framing is accurate. They are told to implement it.
So much for neutrality!
I made an AI request on what nonpartisanship is and is not.
Try it for yourself, and see how the LWV matches up, ...or NOT!