134 Comments
User's avatar
Jeff Tozzer's avatar

The commissioners and Health Officer Berry did not respond to yesterday's email asking about the connection between drug use and increased crime. Here is today's email sent to all three county commissioners:

Dear Commissioners,

The County continues investing in the Housing First model.

At what point will you conclude that the current Housing First strategy isn't working? Specifically, what measurable benchmarks—such as reductions in homelessness, addiction, repeat criminal offenses, emergency medical calls, or public spending—would cause you to reconsider or change course if those outcomes are not achieved?

Second, what would you say to a working family in Clallam County that struggles to pay its bills and doesn't have amenities such as air conditioning, a dog-washing station, or rooftop terraces? How do you explain to them why these features are appropriate and necessary in taxpayer-funded housing for individuals with histories of homelessness and addiction, while many working families cannot afford similar amenities despite working hard for what they have?

I would appreciate your response to both questions.

No One Important's avatar

When do they begin their national media campaign "COME TO CLALLAM COUNTY AND GET A FREE APARTMENT, FREE FOOD, FREE DRUG PARAPHERNALIA, AND FREEDOM TO SO AS YOU PLEASE WITHOUT MORE THAN A FEW HOURS IN JAIL (WHILE YOU GET A HOT MEAL)"

Susie Blake's avatar

begin? lol , have you seen downtown PA on a weekend lately? that horse left the barn a long time ago

Susan C Bonallo's avatar

Susie, is it worse than last year when I took my out of town guest to go Antiquing ?

It was Monday and nothing was open. Maybe they are never open but I know I have shopped there. The store fronts looked like they were done .

Steve O.'s avatar

Susan C Bonallo, that experience must have felt humiliating. In this area business is a hobby.

Steve O.'s avatar

Susie Blake, I haven't visited downtown PA since May when I was required to renew my driver's license at the DMV located inside a long dark, and sullen, alley filled with stinking vagrants. I agree though with your assessment.

Steve O.'s avatar

No One Important, while the city's named Sun Valley, Jackson Hole and Aspen prosper from a wealthy tourist revenue Clallam County has chosen to attract the opposite social class.

No One Important's avatar

Why doesn't that surprise me?

Susan C Bonallo's avatar

Jeff, they never respond to my nicely worded letters asking much the same questions! Shocking isn’t it? Or just a coincidence? Yeah, like that would happen. It’s that nice secretary deleting all the mail asking CC to respond.

Susan C Bonallo's avatar

Oh I finally get it. They built that 16 unit bldg knowing each person would invite his buddies. Then some late evening in summer, all the police, sheriff’s dept and any LE go to one building and arrest them all. Hope that wasn’t a spoiler, you all knew already!!

Susan C Bonallo's avatar

Where are the rules for what is acceptable responses on this blog?

Jeff Tozzer's avatar

Anything goes, just don't criticize my hair.

Lawrence Martin's avatar

120 days. I'll bet the "Under". In under 120 days this facility will be trashed, burned, or require a quarter million in repairs. Not to mention the drug dealing. Guaranteed "

All I can think of is being 19 years old and sharing a large house with 5 guys. We were all friends. None of us were addicts. We did drink beer. A lot of it. Smoked some seedy weed if available. I moved out after 1 week. Constant noise, people I did not know and anything of value had to be kept in the trunk of my car. Look what happened at the last attempt. In not very much time the complex was all but destroyed. (The facility by Swains) I could support a facility run as a Zero Tolerance like the Salvation Army model. Dormitory style. But this is just another grift on taxpayers.

Jennifer's avatar

Lawrence, the only difference I see from the North View Apartments and the Titanic, is that the Titanic had a band.

Eric Fehrmann's avatar

Mike French can play piano at North View, maybe on the roof top terrace, for all the tenants. He will need a new gig next year. May even be looking for permanent housing.

Denise Lapio's avatar

Love that you're back, Jennifer!

Jennifer's avatar

I got a new computer, it took me forever to figure it out! Thank you Denise

Jeff Tozzer's avatar

I second Denise... we missed you!

Lawrence Martin's avatar

Jeff Tozier… you are so gifted.

Piss me off at 4:30 am and then make me chuckle in the afternoon. It’s why I cannot miss a single day. At times I just stack a few up. Then I can get all worked up over 3 or 4 columns at one go. Better for my golf game.

Jennifer's avatar

Lawrence there's nothing like CC napalm in the morning ; )

Jeff Tozzer's avatar

You're welcome :)

Geoff Fox's avatar

Well some maestro orchestrated this, lead singer Freddy I'm on a Bender "Wasted Days and Wasted tax $'s" and backed by the playing on the world's smallest violin - Commissioner

Billy T Wilson's avatar

Priority is also given to those who are frequently incarcerated.

Heinous crime moves you in!

Erin Moore's avatar

I’m thinking exactly the same Lawerence!

My bet is that around the one year mark there will be a disaster of some sort.

Maybe we should start a betting pool on this?🤣🤣🤣

Kristin's avatar

I am not even giving it a year. I am going with a month :(

Susie Blake's avatar

They will move people in slowly at first

Kathy's avatar

It only takes one, as we learned from the guy that sh*t out the window and destroyed that building.

Dale Russell's avatar

Just wondering if one can place a bet, on one of the prediction markets I have heard of, for how long before this place is trashed, rendered uninhabitable or burned down? Other options: how long before the first OD, the first death, etc. I have never personally investigated these markets, but now might be the time. Seriously, what was someone thinking when they came up with the idea of housing addicts and repeat offenders together with no supervision?

Dennis O's avatar

Let's hope we don't see the new "guests", after moving in, listing these places on AirB&B and grabbing a little side income.

Dale Russell's avatar

Shhh. Don’t give them any ideas. But, on the other hand, I would love to see the reviews written by unsuspecting short term renters.

Jennifer's avatar

Dennis O, it will happen, if you think of it, they will be wayyy ahead of you

Kristin's avatar

They weren't thinking at all is the problem. Just a fake feel good for them to make $.

Geoff Fox's avatar

10 to one they sell the washer, dryers, dish washers, toilets, sinks et cetera. Then stack the garbage in the halls so 4PA can haul it

Geoff Fox's avatar

Copper wiring will go first

Lawrence Martin's avatar

Pure Virtue Signaling.

Glen Parker's avatar

Good morning Jeff and Doggers,

Please kick the Socialist crazies out of our county !

I'm sure we can't count in anything from the the state government. I can't wait to see what the Oak street project looks like in a year. I'm sure someone from the county will upkeep the outside for appearance sake but I want video if the interior. I'd like to see how many dishwashers wins till be in place.

It's impossible to care for something you didn't earn. Who's got the biggest mental health issue ?

The soon to be inhabitants or the behavioral health grifters...

Stay tuned for the next chapter all.

Thanks and have a great day!

MK's avatar
Jul 27Edited

If I had $12.75 million and was told to spend it on housing would I find a way to turn the paltry 36 units into something that actually supports more people at say 125 units of modest living quarters that costs around $100,000 per unit, or would I piss it away and serve fewer people?

Does this incredible disparity not piss off the people who writhe in nightly anguish over the immense problem that keeps them up at night?

It's a boondoggle, for sure.

P.S. I wouldn't spend a dime on it actually and instead return the citizens portion to them, but that's me.

Fiscal restraint is missing in this county.

Jake Seegers' platform.

“The challenges facing our county can be solved — if we start asking two simple questions about every policy, every program, every dollar spent: Is it essential? Is it effective?”

— Jake Seegers

Vote for common sense, for a Wedge in this madness.

Jennifer's avatar

MK, I'll ask the most obvious ridiculous pink elephant question for the Northview Apts. Are the EV stations essential? Are they effective?

Eric Fehrmann's avatar

How in the heck are residents able to afford a vehicle of any kind, much less EV? Maybe Windy will be asking Mike French for more grant money to purchase on for the facility.

Jennifer's avatar

Eric, weren't some people talking about paying for the homeless car insurance so they could park at the church? Is car insurance essential to lowering homelessness? Is it effective for reduction of homelessness?

Susie Blake's avatar

The NGO execs building affordable housing don't care about affordabilty or they would be challenging the state on things like the insane way prevailing wage impacts our county or EV stations for mentally disbled who can't even manage free transit alone, much less drive. Eric you are there every meeting paying attention- when Viola Ware talks about how far clients have to commute to get their needs met and that they are doing a study on it, keep in mind PBH gets funding and will dedicate a "caseworker" for an entire day to drive a client to the city for medical appointment for "gender surgery" while seniors and truly disabled deal with long, expensive commutes to get medical care on a regular basis. It will be PBH or other agency execs using the EV station. "clients" won't need to drive because taxpayers will continue funding caseworkers(paid friends) to cart clients around, then all those agency billed miles of client support will be used to justify Ware's goal of a new long term care medical facilty for chronically homeless in PA which will further crash our strained medical services.

Eric Fehrmann's avatar

Long term care medical facilities for mentally and physically ill are not, in my opinion, apartments. Chronically homeless who are capable of productive work need to do just that. Temporary housing is one part of the solution, but permanent housing has not been shown, historically, to mitigate the homeless problem. Just my opinion, base on my limited history.

Susan C Bonallo's avatar

Geez Jennifer, you of all people should know that the “homeless “ crowd only drive Teslas! Wish I could get a new car, but 20 years and 90,000 miles is barely broken in!🥲If they took away my wine, I wouldn’t be such a bundle of sunshine everyday. My husband has requested that Jeff does not go on our upcoming vacation. I just can’t make that promise. It would break the hearts of both Jeff and JAKE SEEGERS for Clallam County Commissioner. Let’s put someone of sound mind in office.

Jennifer's avatar

Susan, I just love this site. It's serious, stupid, fun and YOU DON'T GET BLOCKED

Reagan's avatar

Unfortunately Washington State mandates that newly constructed multifamily housing include specific electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure, with requirements that vary by building size and property type. We've got to rid ourselves of our state Democrat legislators.

Susan C Bonallo's avatar

Well it is such good timing to remove dams that produce …..

electricity.

Jennifer's avatar

Reagan, not that I doubt you, but I would like to see the mandates. I believe it's all in the interpretations. Is the Northview Apts a family housing unit or individuals in a drug recovery program? I would hate to think a family would live in units with low barrier rules. Children intermingled with freshly release criminals? That makes it even worse

Susan C Bonallo's avatar

I think you have to be recently released from prison, using drugs does not prevent you from getting a unit. You aren’t required to be in any treatment program because that would be hurtful to drug addicts. They have feelings, they are just trying to get over them. I had a duplex and did a good job screening and still things went to hell. Who is in charge of this little tax theft ? I just want their pic on my phone so I can demonize them regularly.

Jennifer's avatar

The apartments are just a hole in the ground — you throw money into it and call it a lifestyle.

Mike French, you have created a monster called The Money Pit. It starts new and in a few years this is what we have to look forward to. Renovations, repairs and ridiculous cost, and we haven’t even gotten the first electrical, water or trash bills. Who will be taking advantage of the EV stations, certainly not the residence. Who will be doing their laundry on our dime? There are no barriers. Who will pay the vet bills? Who will pay for this forever folly? Not to worry, Mike French will figure that out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngKHvnn2fFE

Sheldon McGuire's avatar

An old saying, and true. "When you find yourself in a deep hole, STOP digging!" My next request would be to highlight the people responsible for this mistake.

Eric Fehrmann's avatar

Mike French housing solution = grant $$$

Mike French def. grant $$$ = Gov. printing office

Real source of grant $$$ = tax those that produce

🎶 How Long Can This Go On 🎶

Susan C Bonallo's avatar

He’s the county idiot. Listening to him lowers your IQ. They all (3 pigs) got something out of that contract to build our own little mental health facility. Who was the contractor in charge? Where are the public records for itemize construction supplies and all appliances etc. Think how many pockets got lined from plumbers, electricians, roofers, sheet rock installation, painters and suppliers to all the trades.

It stinks as badly as Ozias and his tribal connection. Has any one seen actual evidence that project capped at 12.7 million?

Dennis O's avatar

Welcome back Jennifer! I bet Mike French wishes you hadn't gotten a new computer!

Daniel James O'Keefe's avatar

I have long rejected ANY housing built for anyone by government of any form or subsidized by government of any form unless it's for military or remote government workers themselves. It is one of the LEAST efficient use of taxpayers' money which most of these funds are. Grants are taxpayer money, waiving of fees are taxpayers' money as are levees and new purpose-built taxes. In this case, the CITY of PA alone is coughing up $940,000 of taxpayers' money including the waiving of $100 K of permit fees while the average home builder has to still pay through the nose or is dissuaded from building due to the fees.

Use of taxpayer's money to support housing for all is certainly NOT housing first. NO "Housing First" model around the world, including the oft referenced Utah model, show any measurable improvement in addiction or reduction in addiction and the behaviors around which result in the depletion of the physical condition of the residences (direct 1st hand experience here) far more quickly than average and incur significantly MORE expense in its maintenance and repair as it is all government contract. Some conditions that will result will require all residents to vacate while repairs occur which will be another cost borne by the taxpayer.

The BETTER and more ethical and far more effective way to use that $12,750,000:

ANNUITIZE IT - Committed to helping 36 people/units???

.... At current Period Certain for 25-years. Payout ratios/rates are roughly 4 to 6%. This amount of money would payout, over 25 years, just over $21million at $2000.00 per month x 36 people, every month, for 12 months, for 25 years!! Guaranteed. (numbers are rough estimates)

THAT HELPS PEOPLE. That is fiscally responsible use of the taxpayer's money. Use the taxpayer's money for a hand UP. Even write occupancy conditions where the amount per month adjusts down as income increases and a greater proportion can be carried by the occupant. Make that a condition of a tenancy agreement. If they are going to make it low barrier, at least make it high expectation....

That yields the taxpayer a gain on their money in excess of the average inflation rate. That creates a rental subsidy fund. That sets in motion a level of control over WHAT exactly the funds are used for. THE ROOF OVER YOUR HEAD.... and leaves ALL other operations, development and building to those who do it all the time.

The government is in the unique position that they can make law. Which means they can set the terms of occupancy of new developments. They can issue permits conditional on a certain percentage of units having to be accessible to qualifying individuals. They can contribute to the improvement of people's lives, WITH OUR MONEY and wise practice. This is not that. This is "keep doing what you are doing. Here is a nice place to keep doing it in"

Stop building "the projects" and start recognizing and fostering community. Sticking "Them" into different corners of our communities, reinforces isolation (which equals more depression, more addiction, more social degradation, etc.) and effectively, a caste system that the Government seems focused on doubling down on. This is the "The Soft Bigotry of Low Expectations" being sought, demonstrated AND PRAISED by "advocates" and Local Elected. Very Sad to see in 2026

Lift barriers to building. NOT to occupying, EXCEPT for the subsidizing of monthly housing expense.

If the government is going to take my hard-earned money and yours, at least we should demand they make it grow rather than shrink, only to need more and more and more to keep cleaning up the mess. I am certain there are insurance, maintenance and operating costs associated with this particular building which have yet to be enumerated for public consumption.

I truly see the addicted and unhoused as needy. I do not see them as more deserving than others. Need does not equal deservedness. When someday folks recognize that we can shelter, while demanding clean and sober, we can then step into recovery and do all that is humanly possible to stay there and help "them" grow into the potential they might have always dreamed about for themselves. This won't do that for 36 individuals if they are not expected to be clean and sober or not expected to move on to bigger and better at some anticipated point in time.

MK's avatar

Wow. Very thoughtful response here. Thank you for putting this into perspective.

A hand-up, not a hand-out, pairs well with the human condition.

We can thank President Franklin Roosevelt for government housing which evolved into Section 8.

Rita Lilita's avatar

I supppse taxpayers will be paying the addicts' monthly utility bills too.

Erin Moore's avatar

I was wondering about this as well??? How will the copper in the plumbing/electrical be kept from being stolen???

Jennifer's avatar

Erin, copper will be the resident's first target for income. 'Subletting' will be another. Free 'dog wash' will be another. Sell the fixtures and those fantastic dishwashers. There's all kinds of ways to trash a building and profit from it. If illegal drug use is allowed why not stealing? It's the Taj Mahal for people who aren't required to work or held to any accountability.

Erin Moore's avatar

No doubt about it!!!

Susie Blake's avatar

Clients will pay a percentage of their "income" to PBH as rent, so outside of if they have a disabled veteran or two who earned military disabilty, clients draw SSI (taxpayer $) and PBH gets a cut of that and other subsidies to cover the rest. In their smaller group homes around the neighborhood there are some who are clearly in need of lifelong care to function, and some who have very clearly learned to work the system who can manage to get around all over town to acquire and use drugs but feign disabilty. There's a dude in one right now who literaly got a PBH program certifificate for sobriety while spending all day smoking weed at the estuary daily.

Jennifer's avatar

Susie, you are the sound of reasoning. I don't doubt your words or qualifications to say them ; )

Kathy's avatar

Per the PBH website: "Utilities including broadband internet to be included in rent"

Rita Lilita's avatar

Government-backed disability payments, social security, or public assistance subsidies rather than traditional wage-based employment will be the source of rent payments for these lucky tenants.

Sheldon McGuire's avatar

Low barrier housing will be a disaster. Costs and amenities are excessive. There is NO accountability, either by the tenants or the administration. There is NO harm reduction. Comparison with many other attempts to provide "low barrier housing" show high costs, lawlessness, and enabling. All I see is an irresponsible spending and a burden on the taxpayer. This is poor representation.

jedjennings50's avatar

The PBH in PA had to have cost overruns. The plans they bid on were not complete and left an open interpretation of products and finished project. What was the final cost? Does anyone know? Lawerence is right about the length these units will last. Who is going to manage these units? Police will have to have a precinct there at what cost. The CC people who make these decisions have NO financial common sense our CC is already broke. I wonder if they will use local contractors as they used some outside companies in PA.

Jeff Tozzer's avatar

I don't know the final cost.

Denise Lapio's avatar

What do they usually tell you, Jeff? They're still waiting for final invoices and receipts before disclosing final costs.

Jeff Tozzer's avatar

They just keep saying "it's on budget." But they also say it's "on schedule", even though it's 8 months late. I don't know how to get to the bottom of it.

jedjennings50's avatar

If I was a betting man I would guess 1m. The lighting was around 200k more I am sure.

Susie Blake's avatar

Dawn View was over a million over budget

veronica's avatar

The county "waived" the building permit. How nice. Meanwhile, they squeeze us like oranges to get more and more property tax out of us. This is just gross. It will be a crap hole in a year then, they will ask for more to "fix it". Get a job, save, work, work, work, get a life. I don't know when it became popular to damage those who do this to give to those who don't. The socialist mentality is alive and well in Clallam County.

Susie Blake's avatar

It was the city, but yes, the fee waiver program escalted all fees for single family housing. The fee waiver program is very anti single family home.

Glen Parker's avatar

oh hey by the way...the last two opening songs are awesome Jeff!

Jeff Tozzer's avatar

Those are BOTH from Clallamity Jen ideas! She's hilarious.

Michael J Williams's avatar

What is French getting out of? Wonder, wonder?? Something big?

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jul 27
Comment deleted
Denise Lapio's avatar

A job writing grants for any NGO when Jake wins.

Ron's avatar

Amazing that some people never figure out that free stuff is never respected. This place will be in ruins, within a couple years. If we don’t change our “leaders”, we will be paying for the remodeling too.

Eric Fehrmann's avatar

Cabrini Greens, Chicago, Ill. although this was an example of ghettoization, it was also touted as being an ideal in public housing. Why do we insist on repeating the mistakes of the past? Why do we keep putting lipstick on a pig? Public housing should be temporary, a helping hand to those willing and able to lead productive lives and eventually aid others to their pursuit of happiness. As a young child, 4 years old, my father was serving an apprenticeship, we lived in public assisted housing for a few years. When he finished his indenture we moved on. History has shown that people that have no personal investment in something, also do not take pride in it. Citizens that cannot provide for themselves, due to permanent mental or physical conditions, need to be treated and cared for in facilities designed for those purposes. North View Apartments have not been marketed as fulfilling any of the above. History ignored = history repeated. Just a thought. See you at the ribbon cutting.

Sarah Kincaid's avatar

That which you get for free is worth what you paid for it.

No One Important's avatar

If this isn't an advertisement to homeless bums/addicts/ne'er-do-wells from across the country, I don't know what is. County officials are clearly trying to GROW the homeless problem so that $Billions start rolling in to "solve the homeless problem". It's easy to launder a few percent as accounting noise, and a few percent of even ONE $Billion is 10's of $MIllions that can easily flow into the offshore bank accounts of the politicians. After all, this is a perk for them to justify the grief they get for being in the public spotlight. Why else?

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jul 27
Comment deleted
No One Important's avatar

They likely have, but stealing from taxpayers is a lucrative game for them. Besides, Gates would likely want to see results/accountability for his donations.

Eric Fehrmann's avatar

I can hardly wait for the proclamation to Wendy, and maybe a raise.

Susie Blake's avatar

I won't be able to roll my eyes hard enough🙄