Elected officials that allow themselves to be brainwashed by con artist like NGO's & Tribes should consider the consequences beforehand, like what will you do for employment when the voters had enough of your B.S. and vote in competent leadership.
The unanswered question is who benefits? Is this enterprise, collection of enterprises, worth the cost? What is the contribution to the community to provide drugs, treatments, money, without any hope of reducing the demands? Caring for an existing problem is desirable, but creating a new attraction for people outside our county seems questionable, unless, some one is making a profit from all of this. I would think all would benefit more if we, as a community, reduced the enticements (entitlements) of all this easy access to expensive care. Even that would be acceptable if it did not also encourage an influx of people wanting free care at our expense. Then there is the increase in lawlessness. We are adding to our expenses by becoming a magnet for demanding, new residents. (Immobile RV's, petty crimes, expensive treatments, unexpected expenses, etc.) Where are the contributions from these people? Who benefits?
Rising tides lift all boats.
The only boats in the water are tribal corporation.
Rising tides left those who are tide too shallow.
Elected officials that allow themselves to be brainwashed by con artist like NGO's & Tribes should consider the consequences beforehand, like what will you do for employment when the voters had enough of your B.S. and vote in competent leadership.
Our Kommissars excel at their inability to consider consequences
The Jamestown Corporation didn't exploit Democrat Party exemptions, openly.
They seem to have favored those who would favor them over their own constitutes, and to no surprise, they won.
Masters of manipulation.
Take a look at Tharinger.
So sadly, Steve T towed the line. 🤔
The unanswered question is who benefits? Is this enterprise, collection of enterprises, worth the cost? What is the contribution to the community to provide drugs, treatments, money, without any hope of reducing the demands? Caring for an existing problem is desirable, but creating a new attraction for people outside our county seems questionable, unless, some one is making a profit from all of this. I would think all would benefit more if we, as a community, reduced the enticements (entitlements) of all this easy access to expensive care. Even that would be acceptable if it did not also encourage an influx of people wanting free care at our expense. Then there is the increase in lawlessness. We are adding to our expenses by becoming a magnet for demanding, new residents. (Immobile RV's, petty crimes, expensive treatments, unexpected expenses, etc.) Where are the contributions from these people? Who benefits?